Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*cable\s+ratings\s+Re\:\s+\[TowerTalk\]\s+Using\s+Belden\s+9913\s+on\s+a\s+crankup\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*cable\s+ratings\s+Re\:\s+\[TowerTalk\]\s+Using\s+Belden\s+9913\s+on\s+a\s+crankup\?\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. cable ratings Re: [TowerTalk] Using Belden 9913 on a crankup? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 20:54:38 -0700; The rating process probably isn't all that obscure.. it's probably laid out in all it's glory in MIL-STD-C17 (I think..) There are two limiting aspects for power handling on a cable: voltage and cur; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00546.html (11,007 bytes)
2. Re: cable ratings Re: [TowerTalk] Using Belden 9913 on a crankup? (score: 1): Author: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com>; Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 05:06:32 -0400; probably laid out My points are: 1.) I doubt you'll find small manufacturers with private label cables using the same test methods or standards as larger manufacturers. 2.) Comparing one unknown rat; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00551.html (9,774 bytes)
3. Re: cable ratings Re: [TowerTalk] Using Belden 9913 on a crankup? (score: 1): Author: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>; Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 06:58:34 -0700; -- Original Message -- From: "Tom Rauch" <w8ji@contesting.com> To: "Jim Lux" <jimlux@earthlink.net>; "Bill VanAlstyne" <w5wvo@cybermesa.net>; <towertalk@contesting.com>; "Ed Kucharski" <k3dne@adelphi; /archives//html/Towertalk/2004-04/msg00552.html (12,699 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]