Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*connector\s+losses\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*connector\s+losses\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. connector losses (score: 1): Author: palomino!rabbit!darrel@uunet.uu.net (Darrel Van Buer); Date: Fri, 5 Jul 1996 11:35:22 -0700; The nebulous .05dB per connector in most cases will be SWR related, not ohmic. SWR results in less power at the antenna, but by reflection, not heating. By all means, minimize the number of connector; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-07/msg00044.html (7,087 bytes)
2. connector losses (score: 1): Author: donovanf@sgate.com (Frank Donovan); Date: Fri, 5 Jul 1996 16:07:30 -0400 (EDT); Darrel, If u haven't seen this chart, here's a convenient way to compare cable losses and make tradeoffs before investing lotsa $$$ in new coax. 73! Frank W3LPL CABLE ATTENUATION (dB per 100 ft) 1.8; /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-07/msg00046.html (9,413 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]