- 1. mast (score: 1)
- Author: jrob@epix.net (jrob@epix.net)
- Date: Sun, 20 Oct 1996 08:02:15 -0700
- Howdy all, I wonder what people use for mast that sticks up about 10 or so feet above the tower and holds more than one multiband antenna? I put up 1 1/2" galvanized steel pipe and it failed......ben
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-10/msg00258.html (7,569 bytes)
- 2. mast (score: 1)
- Author: donovanf@sgate.com (Frank Donovan)
- Date: Sun, 20 Oct 1996 10:05:09 -0400 (EDT)
- Jeff, Given your bad experiences with water pipe masts, I can't imagine why you want to use water pipe again and "don't have time" to use material designed for mechanical use instead of water! You li
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-10/msg00259.html (8,478 bytes)
- 3. mast (score: 1)
- Author: kb3aug@erols.com (Bill Hinkle)
- Date: Sun, 20 Oct 1996 11:21:46 +0000
- Jeff, I see your from PA. I dont know how far you are from Baltimore, but there are all kinds of steel suppliers there. What you want is, 2" x .250 wall tubing. You can also get it in .375 wall. If B
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-10/msg00260.html (8,957 bytes)
- 4. mast (score: 1)
- Author: broz@csn.net (John Brosnahan)
- Date: Sun, 20 Oct 1996 09:23:55 -0600
- Jeff,N3MLV, Prime example of why not to use water pipe -- it isn't rated for structural use! Strength goes up much faster for an increase in diameter compared to the increase in wall thickness--bette
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-10/msg00261.html (8,671 bytes)
- 5. mast (score: 1)
- Author: kq0b@sprintmail.com (michael w. elliot)
- Date: Sun, 20 Oct 1996 11:25:36 -0500
- Well it is like this, you want cheap or the best??? I have tried cheap and you get what you paid for like having it up during a contest or a once in a life time dxpedition and the mast folds over and
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-10/msg00262.html (9,256 bytes)
- 6. mast (score: 1)
- Author: ab5tv@ix.netcom.com (ab5tv@ix.netcom.com)
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 04:22:44 -0700
- Another saying is that there may not be enough time to do it right the first time, but there is always time enough to do it right the second or third or fourth time. Tom K5RC, former editor of the Na
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-10/msg00263.html (8,921 bytes)
- 7. mast (score: 1)
- Author: fisher@hp-and2.an.hp.com (Tony Brock-Fisher)
- Date: Mon, 21 Oct 1996 09:40:40 -0400
- 1. Schedule 80 pipe, or any kind of water pipe, is not spec'd for yield strength, so there's no way to analyze the case to see if it's strong enough. 2. Going to 2" nominal (2.4" O.D.) will GREATLY i
- /archives//html/Towertalk/1996-10/msg00270.html (7,205 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu