Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:NE5B@texasparadise.com: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] Banning The Use Of 144.200 MHz During Contests (score: 1)
Author: "Ben - ne5B" <NE5B@texasparadise.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jun 2006 14:16:21 +0000
I think what they are trying to say is 144.200 is only for casual slowtalking GridSquare Hunters and Rag Chewers... Seriously: What about all the HF Nets that Field Day interrupts??? No special rules
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-06/msg00192.html (10,491 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] vhf/uhf activity (score: 1)
Author: "Ben - ne5B" <NE5B@texasparadise.com>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 20:58:07 +0000
I feel that the reason that most of our Week Signals Enthusiasts are Extra class is because the average Tech is still in the "checking it out" phase of the hobby. They haven't been exposed to as the
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-02/msg00094.html (15,905 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS and Contesting (score: 1)
Author: "Ben - ne5B" <NE5B@texasparadise.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Aug 2007 20:36:01 +0000
my 2 cents worth.. Rovers with APRS? What's the big deal - I view it as the same as using the DX Clusters looking for multipliers in HF contests.... So what if APRS gives fixed stations a slight adva
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-08/msg00103.html (9,066 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]
This search system is powered by Namazu