Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:Ray@w9ray.org: 85 ]

Total 85 documents matching your query.

41. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF/UHF SWR Meter (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <Ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 16:35:46 -0500
http://www.diamond-ant.jp/ama2/eng_ama_2_7_3.asp Diamond SX400N Frequency range:140 to 525MHz Power display range:5W 20W 200W Accuracy at full scale:5W Range ±10%(F.S),20W Range ±5%(F.S),200W Range ±
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-04/msg00076.html (8,917 bytes)

42. Re: [VHFcontesting] Yaesu FT450 product review confusion (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <Ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Wed, 16 Apr 2008 16:24:36 -0500
well, This is no different than any other cheap mobile radio then... _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.co
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-04/msg00087.html (8,290 bytes)

43. Re: [VHFcontesting] Sable Island CY0X (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <Ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 06:34:51 -0500
WSJT can be set up in cw mode but i think it uses 1 or 2 minute sequences...? also would also have the benefit of having jt65 and fsk441 at your disposal Ray J w9ray _________________________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-04/msg00094.html (10,279 bytes)

44. Re: [VHFcontesting] HF +6 xcvrs & Transverters (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <Ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Mon, 19 May 2008 16:31:46 -0500
Try to have more than 1 radio... There are many times where you are going to want to be able to be on more than 1 band at a time.. I would think the 2 meter radio should be a stand alone setup I thin
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-05/msg00086.html (8,162 bytes)

45. Re: [VHFcontesting] 222 Amps (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <Ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Tue, 20 May 2008 21:51:47 -0500
think about your only option in this neck of the wood is TE systems amps..? quick search.. http://www.randl.com/cgi-local/cart/cart.cgi?cart=Search&groupnumber=(12030) 2210 TE SYSTEMS 220-225MHz 5-10
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-05/msg00097.html (9,655 bytes)

46. Re: [VHFcontesting] Nuking (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <Ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 21:23:18 -0500
my first sypply was a Pyramid ... never again.... it lost regulation... 23 volts into the 746.. Icom must build em good because the only damage was, it let the smoke out of the driver transistors.. a
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-05/msg00114.html (10,699 bytes)

47. Re: [VHFcontesting] Post-Contest Grid Square Queries (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <Ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2008 16:50:20 -0500
I would think that that would be wrong, asking something that is a required part of the contest exchange after the contest is over... If you need to ask their call sign or grid square later.. It is o
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00174.html (10,234 bytes)

48. Re: [VHFcontesting] IC-706 Cross Mode Operation (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <Ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 16:52:34 -0500
You could use an external cw keyer, with audio sidetone output and run it into your radio mic input.. then you can stay on ssb all the time.. _______________________________________________ VHFcontes
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00398.html (9,708 bytes)

49. Re: [VHFcontesting] 432 antenna plans (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <Ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2008 20:55:49 -0500
I personally, myself don't think I would consider spending the time putting up omni antenna, for a main antenna on 432... when a decent gain yagi are not very large on 432.. a 8' yagi will have 7+ db
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00132.html (8,285 bytes)

50. Re: [VHFcontesting] Icom 756 Pro III-Transverter, and WSJT (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <Ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2008 16:32:26 -0500
More than likely the transverter port on the back of the 756 is very low output power and your transverter is set up to take a higher input power. commonly 10 watts... How much power were you running
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-08/msg00054.html (9,643 bytes)

51. Re: [VHFcontesting] Icom 820H and transverters (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <Ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 22:58:09 -0600
Depends on what you mean by "unless the ACC plug on the rear panel is what I would use." You could hook the Send line to the keying interface for transverter. And you could put a negative voltage int
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00211.html (7,833 bytes)

52. Re: [VHFcontesting] Pa1six ????? (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <Ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Wed, 10 Dec 2008 22:05:23 -0600
Web archive service at http://web.archive.org last seen http://home.planet.nl/~pa1six/pa1six.htm in February Ray J -- This Message has been scanned By AVG Anti-Virus 8.0.169 http://www.avg.com ______
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-12/msg00116.html (7,574 bytes)

53. Re: [VHFcontesting] rf problem (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <Ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 22:15:26 -0600
thats a surprise? there is probably several watts of 50mhz coming back down your coax to your 2 meter setup. hard to believe its getting through the dci filter that good though.. is that the big (12"
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-12/msg00122.html (8,043 bytes)

54. Re: [VHFcontesting] digital modes (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <Ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:02:40 -0600
http://www.physics.princeton.edu/pulsar/K1JT/WSJT597.EXE -- This Message has been scanned By AVG Anti-Virus 8.0.169 http://www.avg.com _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting ma
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-01/msg00105.html (7,853 bytes)

55. Re: [VHFcontesting] 28 MHz vs. 144 MHz IF (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <Ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 23:53:57 -0600
If you have a high performance hf rig available, why use 2 meters. or the other way around... I do not think there is anything commercial out there that uses a 10 meter IF above 1296 though.. I have
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-01/msg00156.html (7,833 bytes)

56. Re: [VHFcontesting] Concerning Tilton's Rule (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <Ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:14:47 -0500
the '08 UHF contest rules clearly states 4. Exchange: Grid-square locater 6. Miscellaneous: 1. 6.1 Partial QSOs do not count. Both callsigns, full exchanges and acknowledgment must be sent and receiv
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-03/msg00054.html (9,080 bytes)

57. Re: [VHFcontesting] assisted class (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <Ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2009 17:30:38 -0500
In NO way should using 1 band to arrange a contact on a different band ever be considered Assisted or against contest rules. -- This Message has been scanned By AVG Anti-Virus 8.0.169 http://www.avg.
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-03/msg00085.html (7,673 bytes)

58. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHFcontesting Digest, Vol 75, Issue 24 (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <Ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Wed, 18 Mar 2009 17:41:16 -0500
Some repeaters are remotely linked with the phone system.. thus using non-amateur means of communication.. (i'm diggin deep :-p ) more than likely is is a rule made eons ago, by someone who worked on
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-03/msg00115.html (8,642 bytes)

59. Re: [VHFcontesting] Why does Unlimited Rover exist? (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Thu, 28 May 2009 17:38:23 -0500
They can have as many operators as they want. They do not need to follow the 100 qso rover limit. They do not need to transport the equipment with them. so they can use a bus load of guys and drive a
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-05/msg00455.html (9,134 bytes)

60. Re: [VHFcontesting] 8660C won't go over 100MHz (score: 1)
Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Jun 2009 19:07:29 -0500
It's 1300 Mhz max, isnt it? You get up to 1299.999.. isn't that good enough? _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.conte
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-06/msg00069.html (8,138 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu