I have received a number of emails being returned due to a virus content. In checking the full headers, the email does not originate from my server. Instead, the email virus is using my email address
Tom, If you take the wavelength of the booms, compare that to the K1FO antenna in the ARRL Antenna Handbook, you will get fairly close - within a few inches. Don't compare the number of elements but
Warren, In this case you have gathered the information on your own with no outside help. The other station is basically sending CQ in digital mode, You have picked up that CQ via your own radio and y
I don't know if anyone else has noticed, but the League has posted the logs received with claimed scores for the June 2003 VHF Party and I've got to say I'm somewhat disappointed. I did what I though
I already got to emails asking where they are posted. Should have put the link in the email - Here is the page with links to any claimed scores. http://www.arrl.org/contests/claimed/ Lee Scott - AA1Y
In reply to Tree's question on 1296 experiences - I have a DEMI 3w unit mounted in a box at the top of my 30' tower. There is a 14' run of 9913 coax to the driven element of a 55 ele looper (Directiv
Have to put my 2 cents in here. Even though I'm an Extra Class, I'll admit I'm one which used the 5wpm to get my license. I am not a good CW copier. I've always had a dyslexic problem when it comes t
I will be up and running from my QTH (FN43gc) the whole contest on bands 222 --> 1296 and part of the contest I will be on 10g from my back yard. I will have SSB, CW, and JT44 modes on every band. I
??? Seems to me, back in the early 70's we only had 2 categories - single and multi. If you look at the number of logs submitted vs the number of hams who had equipment to participate, I bet you wou
I do have a Compaq Alpha Server and I don't think it would choke on 100M records. If I could get a copy of the data, I'd be happy to port the data into a database, do any number crunching required a
I don't see not having a GPS a problem unless you are on the move. The only drawback might be the requirement of exchanging a 6 digit grid. Personally, I'd like to see 6 digit grids exchanged anyway
Rick, I have the feeling you are well qualified to speak about submitting your logs. You are probably the type who would not submit logs and maybe by understanding what made you decide to submit is j
I will be on tonight from New Hampshire - maybe not right on 7pm local but soon there after and will be looking quite intently. Equipment is already warmed up. Lee Scott - AA1YN Home of the VHF & Up
Tim, Neither JT44 nor WSJT puts the grid or lat/lon into the CQ message so is not self spotting unless you deliberately put the info into the CQ message. PSK31 is the same way also. Lee Scott - AA1Y
Hi Andy, I agree and when I recorded my voice CQ call, I did put my grid into the call. When I work JT44 during a contest, I've already made contact on a lower band and use that band as a liaison dur
Those who are active in meteor scattor - specifically WSJT, know I have a register to produce a callsign/grid locator file for the WSJT program. To date, there are just under 800 persons registered i
Dale / AF1T will be on during the full contest covering every band from 6m thru 10G. His location is FN43cd. I will be on during the full contest covering every band from 6m thru 1296 - maybe a coupl
Eric, If you notice, the published scores are available to anyone members or not. It is just that the members get to view the results a little earlier and we also get an expanded score showing everyo
John, I thought I'd step in with some pointers to you and others thinking of trying WSJT during the contest. The best thing to do would first go to http://www.pingjockey.net/cgi-bin/pingtalk and see
Here is some info from FN43 AA1YN will be on the air from FN43gc the entire contest. I will have 6m through 23cm and am capable of JT44 on all bands. Can also work WSJT though I have no skeds As time