Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:dougdever@gmail.com: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] AB8M/R this weekend. (score: 1)
Author: Douglas Dever <dougdever@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2011 22:40:18 -0400
This will be the 2nd VHF contest for me as a rover. My other operator bailed on me, but I'm going to run solo - we'll see how long I last like that. Timeline is up in the air, but at the least, I wil
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2011-09/msg00050.html (7,402 bytes)

2. [VHFcontesting] AB8M/R - Western PA and NE Ohio (score: 1)
Author: Douglas Dever <dougdever@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2015 19:40:44 -0400
Here's the plan for the weekend, will be a strictly "stop and shoot" set-up with a modest 6m and 2m beam and a collapsible 25ft mast... Day One: 16:00 ET - FN11 - Show Shoe PA. 17:30 ET - FN10 - Wing
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2015-07/msg00028.html (6,949 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] OMG (score: 1)
Author: Douglas Dever <dougdever@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2018 10:56:28 -0400
Most people on 313 probably didn't even realize there was a contest, they just saw a bunch of spots and assumed the band was open. CQ WW VHF doesn't have the sort of awareness that the ARRL contests
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-07/msg00075.html (11,456 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Beware the FT8 Flaw (score: 1)
Author: Douglas Dever <dougdever@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2019 14:07:40 -0400
The solution to this is to not him or her in your logbook. I see some folks doing this kind of thing to try for a higher rate. I just treat it as not being a QSO. There's plenty of other EA stations
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-05/msg00087.html (15,239 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL VHF Test 3 Band Category - long rant better delete!! (score: 1)
Author: Douglas Dever <dougdever@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 22:20:30 -0500
I get that long time hams hate FT8 and new hams can't understand why anyone would use anything other than FT8 because in a text message and Twitter world no one can have actual dialogue that makes an
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00079.html (14,405 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8?- tarnation! (score: 1)
Author: Douglas Dever <dougdever@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2021 17:41:24 -0500
Nope, I think you're doing it right. When both bands were running I was busy with all the things you mentioned - and the same concerns. When when I was off on FM or SSB trying to scrounge up some loc
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2021-01/msg00147.html (10,611 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT8 and VHF contesting (score: 1)
Author: Douglas Dever <dougdever@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 14 Jan 2022 12:01:47 -0500
FT or not, I'm not sure you'd see those rates again on SSB. Maybe on 6 since almost every modern HF radio has 6 in it - but certainly not on 2m or up. The number of hams with 2m or higher sideband ca
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-01/msg00046.html (17,142 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu