Mail Archive Search: <+from:dpease@adams.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:dpease@adams.net: 26 ]

Total 26 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [VHFcontesting] roverroverrover (score: 1): Author: dpease@adams.net; Date: Fri, 19 Aug 2005 07:31:36 -0500; That delete key doesn't prevent 80 emails a day from coming into my inbox! I pay money to keep SPAM out, this is getting almost as bad. Talk about dead horses!! Danny NG9R Danny Pease dpease@adams.ne; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00348.html (9,060 bytes)
22. [VHFcontesting] DEM 903 transverter power output (score: 1): Author: dpease@adams.net; Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 11:55:00 -0500; Just curious, what do those of you that use the 10 watt DEM 903 transverter see for measured outout in CW? I have 2 and they both run about 6 watts out. Is this typical or are both of mine a bit low?; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00182.html (7,322 bytes)
23. [VHFcontesting] stacking loop yagis (score: 1): Author: dpease@adams.net; Date: Mon, 03 Jul 2006 14:27:07 -0500; I am wanting to stack pairs of loop yagis for 1296 and 903 on opposite sides of the same H fram, 1296 on one side and 903 on the other. I would like to keep the physical distance between the differen; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-07/msg00030.html (7,313 bytes)
24. [VHFcontesting] TE systems amplifiers (score: 1): Author: "Danny Pease" <dpease@adams.net>; Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 21:30:44 -0600; Who carries TE Systems amplifiers, specifically a 4410G? The only place I have found that lists them is R&L Electronics and they are special order only and they have had one on order since last April; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-01/msg00132.html (7,128 bytes)
25. [VHFcontesting] FM only frequencies (score: 1): Author: "Danny Pease" <dpease@adams.net>; Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 12:31:53 -0600; I will agree, 146.520 is not used very much, but why does anyone think it should be used for contesting when there are many other frequencies available? I don't think we have many still using crystal; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-12/msg00022.html (7,239 bytes)
26. Re: [VHFcontesting] LoTW and VHF (score: 1): Author: "Danny Pease" <dpease@adams.net>; Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 11:15:54 -0500; I see very poor percentage of VHF QSO's on LoTW. I do see a very high percentage (relatively) for any digital QSO's on LoTW. I have noticed an extreme change to QSL's in general on VHF, at one time i; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-06/msg00077.html (9,667 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 26
Page: [1] [2]