Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:jamesduffey@comcast.net: 379 ]

Total 379 documents matching your query.

201. [VHFcontesting] Updated - Rover activity and otherwise in June ARRL VHF (score: 1)
Author: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 10:46:11 -0700
Shortly after the initial posting of claimed scores for the June 2009 VHF Contest, I did a brief analysis on the Rover activity in the June Contest and posted it to the list. Now that the final resul
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-12/msg00005.html (10,012 bytes)

202. [VHFcontesting] Rover generated 222 MHz QSOs reduced under new rules? (score: 1)
Author: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 29 Nov 2009 14:33:35 -0700
I was curious as to the effect on 1.35M (222MHz) QSOs of the new Limited Rover rule that stipulates that 6M, 2M, 1.35M and 0.7M be used as the Limited Rover's 4 bands: 222 MHz QSOs from Rovers in Jun
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-12/msg00006.html (9,361 bytes)

203. Re: [VHFcontesting] Updated - Rover activity and otherwise in June ARRL VHF (score: 1)
Author: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 18:59:06 -0700
If you look at the number of rover entries it is fairly constant from year to year on basically an upward slope. Since its inception, rover activity has only decreased in 3 years. Total contest activ
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-12/msg00018.html (9,332 bytes)

204. Re: [VHFcontesting] Updated - Rover activity and otherwise in June ARRL VHF (score: 1)
Author: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2009 19:54:14 -0700
Nate - Thanks for your comments. I would estimate that there are only 200 to 300 hams in the US equipped to do serious roving. It may be one of the smallest speciality groups in ham radio. So a turno
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-12/msg00020.html (9,874 bytes)

205. Re: [VHFcontesting] Updated - Rover activity and otherwise in June ARRL VHF (score: 1)
Author: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Dec 2009 07:36:02 -0700
It is pretty easy to get this information back to 2002 with the scores database at arrl.org. Before that it becomes more tedious: you need to access the QST writeup on the contest, if they summarized
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-12/msg00021.html (8,475 bytes)

206. Re: [VHFcontesting] Updated - Rover activity and otherwise in June ARRL VHF (score: 1)
Author: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 7 Dec 2009 17:54:39 -0700
Here is a table of activity in all classes since 2001. The data is harder to extract from contests before 2001 as it is not collated on the ARRLweb site and is not always explicit in the QST write up
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-12/msg00032.html (11,232 bytes)

207. [VHFcontesting] FT897's, IF radios, etc (score: 1)
Author: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 19 Dec 2009 09:33:48 -0700
Chet - Thanks for the interesting note, which included this statement: "Software Defined Radios next? It will be interesting to do the numbers when the data is in for them." Sherwood has numbers for
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-12/msg00068.html (9,439 bytes)

208. [VHFcontesting] Adding a band, which one? (score: 1)
Author: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 19:35:51 -0700
I find more activity on 222 MHz and it is usually easier (read cheaper) to generate power at 222 MHz rather than on 1296 MHz, so I think 222 MHz is more productive. Particularly in contests. High gai
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-01/msg00060.html (7,983 bytes)

209. [VHFcontesting] KK6MC/r in January Contest (score: 1)
Author: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 20:30:33 -0700
I will be roving in the January Contest, January 23, 24 and 25. Look for me. Here is my preliminary itinerary. We will start in DM31, move to DM32, DM42, DM41, probably overnighting in Tucson, DM42.
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-01/msg00092.html (8,350 bytes)

210. [VHFcontesting] WSJT for random contacts in contests? (score: 1)
Author: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 08:39:06 -0700
Does anyone have experience using WSJT to make random contacts in VHF/UHF contacts? That is, calling CQ on a specific frequency without skeds and making contacts? Do you work enough additional contac
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-01/msg00098.html (7,770 bytes)

211. [VHFcontesting] Es Opening on SIx (score: 1)
Author: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 09:34:58 -0700
There is a modest Es opening to the midwest as I write this. Lets hope it is a harbinger of good things to m=come in the VHF contest next week. - Duffey -- KK6MC James Duffey Cedar Crest NM _________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-01/msg00105.html (7,036 bytes)

212. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] January VHF Sweepstakes (score: 1)
Author: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:25:58 -0700
_______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-01/msg00141.html (7,935 bytes)

213. [VHFcontesting] KK6MC/r January 2010 VHF Contest Itinerary (score: 1)
Author: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2010 20:49:45 -0700
It is contest time again!!! I want to work you. KK6MC/r will rove in the contest this weekend. Here is my planned Itinerary for the January ARRL VHF Sweepstakes. 1900 Z DM31, North end of Organ Pipe
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-01/msg00147.html (8,789 bytes)

214. [VHFcontesting] KK6MC/r all ready to go- but where? (score: 1)
Author: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2010 20:40:57 -0700
Between rain showers, the occasional snow flurries, and 20-30 mph winds, I got the rover set up this afternoon. Some of the feedline is muddy now. I am all ready to go, except for the computer. But w
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-01/msg00155.html (8,030 bytes)

215. [VHFcontesting] KK6MC/r Status (score: 1)
Author: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 07:34:40 -0700
We have a couple of inches of snow here now and light snow showers. As Albuquerque and points south and west are just getting rain, unless it gets worse, we will probably go ahead and head out for AZ
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-01/msg00156.html (7,029 bytes)

216. [VHFcontesting] KK6MC/r in DM42 (score: 1)
Author: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2010 20:03:38 -0700
After a snowy start we made it to DM42 to spend the night, so after a few minor repairs to the 6M antenna and picking up a step stool that I forgot, we should pretty much be on the schedule I e-maile
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-01/msg00162.html (6,692 bytes)

217. [VHFcontesting] KK6MC/r on the way to DM31 (score: 1)
Author: James Duffey <JamesDuffey@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Jan 2010 07:44:58 -0700
We are nearly ready to head out for the contest. The weather looks like it will be reasonable today. We need to make a couple of stops and get the 6M antenna straightened out, but nothing major. Look
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-01/msg00167.html (7,340 bytes)

218. [VHFcontesting] 70 cm allocations (score: 1)
Author: James Duffey <JamesDuffey@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 20:45:49 -0700
The latest (January 15, 2010) FCC frequency allocations can be down loaded here: < http://www.fcc.gov/oet/spectrum/table/fcctable.pdf > Footnote US7 contains the restrictions on 70 cm operation: US7
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-01/msg00186.html (8,479 bytes)

219. [VHFcontesting] Oops... nevermind (score: 1)
Author: James Duffey <JamesDuffey@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2010 11:49:33 -0700
Steve Send the query to Sean, KX9X. He has the final say. I think that when this question came up in the past, rovers were not allowed to use APRS or find other stations, except for the unlimited cla
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-01/msg00192.html (7,638 bytes)

220. [VHFcontesting] FCC Frequency Allocation Map for 70 cm 10 years out of date (score: 1)
Author: James Duffey <jamesduffey@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 13:54:48 -0700
Jon - You suggested referring to the 70 cm allocation map on the FCC web site: "the limits include a lot more than 100 miles around Otis. Here is a link to the map showing where the restrictions appl
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-01/msg00204.html (9,091 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu