Mail Archive Search: <+from:john.maxwell@johnmaxwell.net>

Results:

References: [ +from:john.maxwell@johnmaxwell.net: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Comments on proposed VHF+ rules changes (score: 1): Author: "John Maxwell" <john.maxwell@johnmaxwell.net>; Date: Sun, 7 Mar 2004 10:13:41 -0700; Dear Committee et al, Well, it seems that your rule change will badly affect our ability to have any kind of score for the VHF contest as well as our desire to run any VHF or microwave contest. Not t; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-03/msg00038.html (9,147 bytes)
2. RE: [VHFcontesting] Comments on proposed VHF+ rules changes (score: 1): Author: "John Maxwell" <john.maxwell@johnmaxwell.net>; Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 08:06:09 -0700; Everybody is entitled to an opinion. That's mine. John Maxwell N0WBW notice a here. So, here is how well the request for input was distributed: * Sent to the VHF Contesting email reflector (100s of s; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-03/msg00045.html (12,469 bytes)
3. RE: [VHFcontesting] Comments on proposed VHF+ rules changes (score: 1): Author: "John Maxwell" <john.maxwell@johnmaxwell.net>; Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2004 08:16:05 -0700; Kenneth, Since you are friends of Gene, W3ZZ and know Gene is the real force behind these rules changes. I would not truly surprised if you are not at work behind the scenes pushing for this agenda.; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-03/msg00046.html (13,054 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]