Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k7cw@yahoo.com: 114 ]

Total 114 documents matching your query.

61. [VHFcontesting] Fw: CQ CONTEST. (score: 1)
Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 19 Jul 2008 08:53:22 -0700 (PDT)
Here's an update on N7AMA/WA7JTM visit to DM32. Note that they have decided to be there for the beginning of the contest. 73, Paul, K7CW _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-07/msg00208.html (7,917 bytes)

62. Re: [VHFcontesting] 222 and 902/3 transverters (score: 1)
Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Oct 2008 12:57:03 -0700 (PDT)
Microwave Modules used to sell a nice little 384 MHz box that put out 0.5 watts. Back when folks used to multiply up with varactors, here's what you could get: 384 x 3 = 1152 1152 + 144 = 1296 1152 x
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-10/msg00065.html (9,578 bytes)

63. Re: [VHFcontesting] Great idea -- Kudos to Grid Pirates (score: 1)
Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 16:39:07 -0800 (PST)
You guys kill me. You know, it's awfully hard to sit here reading about all this conjured up evilness, deception and blatant disregard for the "intent" of the rules without jumping in. So, here I am,
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-12/msg00032.html (16,699 bytes)

64. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF logs made public (score: 1)
Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 18:56:20 -0800 (PST)
Chet, It's worth 2 cents to me. You make a good argument for not having open logs. According to KR7O, the ARRL has already explained why they have elected to not have open logs. Sounds good to me. 73
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-12/msg00040.html (11,276 bytes)

65. Re: [VHFcontesting] digital modes (score: 1)
Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jan 2009 06:22:00 -0800 (PST)
Hi Chris, Google "WSJT" Select "WSJT Homepage" Select "Download" (in left margin) Select WSJT597.EXE (second line in text) 73, Paul, K7CW what is a good website to download the software for WSJT. I a
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-01/msg00097.html (8,136 bytes)

66. Re: [VHFcontesting] Making skeds on HF during VHF contests? (score: 1)
Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:02:37 -0800 (PST)
Decades ago, folks used to gather on 3818 kHz for sked making. Don't know if they do now, or not. I agree that using HF frequencies of okay for setting skeds during the contest. 73, Paul, K7CW Hi Bil
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-01/msg00147.html (8,592 bytes)

67. Re: [VHFcontesting] VUCC Card Checking Question comments (score: 1)
Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:31:14 -0800 (PST)
There is one other factor that's important. If someone receives an award that he doesn't deserve, his call is included with those of persons who earned the award legitimately, thus effectively dimini
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-01/msg00205.html (9,579 bytes)

68. Re: [VHFcontesting] MR.T goes roving (score: 1)
Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:12:51 -0800 (PST)
I know that you are probably aware of it, but many on here are not, that N6NB is well known for having had an EME-capable rover for many years that he drove around the country entering contests with.
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00048.html (11,219 bytes)

69. Re: [VHFcontesting] MR.T goes roving (score: 1)
Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2009 16:48:59 -0800 (PST)
This was, of course, before the Rover category was created and back when Wayne's call was K6YNB. He had a pickup with camper. Mounted on the back of the camper was a small crankup tower with a 144 MH
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00051.html (8,647 bytes)

70. Re: [VHFcontesting] A distance scoring contest (score: 1)
Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 09:26:33 -0800 (PST)
Hi Kevin, I say let's not go on a cabin-fever, contest-renovation crusade! The 4-character grid locator multiplier system works just fine in the US and Canada. We do not have high population densitie
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00175.html (11,240 bytes)

71. Re: [VHFcontesting] What is really "wrong" with the ARRL Rover-category rules. (score: 1)
Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 10:10:39 -0800 (PST)
Well, I don't know about "anger and angst among the greater amateur population."  I guess I must be in the minority. ;-) K7CW -- On Sun, 2/15/09, Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com> wrote: From: Duane - N9
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00190.html (10,839 bytes)

72. Re: [VHFcontesting] The Psychology of Contest Participation (score: 1)
Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 10:41:29 -0800 (PST)
Well, Joe, You seem to have the solution for most things. The problem here, though, is that we are talking about contests. People who enter competitions must realize that they may not win. It is not
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00192.html (14,171 bytes)

73. Re: [VHFcontesting] The Psychology of Contest Participation (score: 1)
Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 12:44:35 -0800 (PST)
People enter competitions for whatever reason. Fairness is not the problem here for two reasons: 1) The same rules apply to everyone entering a contest category and 2) there is no level playing field
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00198.html (10,420 bytes)

74. Re: [VHFcontesting] psyched out (score: 1)
Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 20:08:20 -0800 (PST)
Frank, You didn't have to take that quote out of context, but it still applies. Your other enhancement didn't help you, either. In an indirect way, I addressed the "situation" in California. But, sin
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00212.html (10,428 bytes)

75. Re: [VHFcontesting] psyched out (score: 1)
Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:26:26 -0800 (PST)
Hi Ron, Perhaps I shouldn't have said "large". Of course, nothing has been settled as to rules, but the general feeling out there is that 6-character grids would be used for the report. If that were
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00215.html (14,242 bytes)

76. Re: [VHFcontesting] frisbee roving (score: 1)
Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:02:28 -0800 (PST)
Frank, With all due respect, you need to not let your blood pressure get so high. I do think that the ARRL needs to weed out the word "intent" and write the rules in a way that is straight forward (w
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00216.html (11,473 bytes)

77. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover rule changes (score: 1)
Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 12:38:40 -0800 (PST)
It is interesting to note that there is apparently some disagreement going on among members of the VUAC. One member being N6NB and another being W7DHC. I think relative experience and personal biases
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00273.html (16,293 bytes)

78. Re: [VHFcontesting] Questions on making a valid contest QSO. (score: 1)
Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:06:20 -0700 (PDT)
The FCC rules have it that you must give your call at least once per contact. Otherwise the contest rules specify what they want from you. K7CW I suppose that you mean how many QSOs go like this: CQ
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-03/msg00040.html (9,471 bytes)

79. Re: [VHFcontesting] Questions on making a valid contest QSO. (score: 1)
Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Mar 2009 16:25:32 -0700 (PDT)
For most contests, this is sufficient: CQ contest K7CW W9RM W9RM (report) Thanks (report) 73 CQ contest K7CW As far as the FCC is concerned, I am legal and you are legal. As far as most contest rules
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-03/msg00046.html (11,701 bytes)

80. Re: [VHFcontesting] Concerning Tilton's Rule (score: 1)
Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 23:41:09 -0700 (PDT)
Hi Marshall, I applaud you for your positive approaches to the betterment of VHF contesting and operating in general. I respectfully disagree with you regarding "what constitutes a VHF QSO." As I men
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-03/msg00057.html (14,822 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu