Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:k8cc@comcast.net: 91 ]

Total 91 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [VHFcontesting] Mounting omni loops to tower legs (score: 1)
Author: "David A. Pruett" <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Apr 2004 09:47:49 -0500
Todd, I have had a pair of 6M KB6KQ loops mounted on my tower for over two years and they seem to work fine. These are mounted directly to the Rohn 45G tower leg and separated 20' apart vertically. I
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-04/msg00005.html (9,627 bytes)

22. Re: [VHFcontesting] Renewing Interest in VHF Contesting (score: 1)
Author: "David A. Pruett" <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 08 May 2004 22:18:13 -0400
At 08:15 PM 5/8/04 -0400, N3AWS@aol.com wrote: So how do we get the attention of the HF only ops? BTW I do my share of HF contesting, too. Although I got my general in 79, it was almost 20 years befo
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-05/msg00020.html (9,920 bytes)

23. [VHFcontesting] CQ VHF Contest From VA (score: 1)
Author: "David A. Pruett" <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 23:05:06 -0400
I've just discovered that I will be in Virginia for the weekend of the CQ VHF Contest, and so I'm seeking advice which might be useful to get on the air. I am an electrical engineer for DaimlerChrysl
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-06/msg00098.html (7,831 bytes)

24. Re: [VHFcontesting] Field Day Band Changes (score: 1)
Author: "David A. Pruett" <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 22:05:00 -0400
At 04:16 AM 6/24/04 +0000, Matthew Pepper wrote: Do you those of you who work field day VHF stations wait the 15 minutes in between band/mode changes. Or do you just pass a station up the bands like
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-06/msg00103.html (7,641 bytes)

25. Re: [VHFcontesting] 6m Array Switching (score: 1)
Author: "David A. Pruett" <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2004 11:07:28 -0400
Ev, It only takes a few minutes to construct a model of this antenna in K6STI's AO program. All antennas: 14.14 dBi @ 7 degrees Upper pair: 12.67 dBi @ 6 degrees Lower pair: 11.84 dBi @ 12 degrees I'
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-07/msg00011.html (9,836 bytes)

26. RE: [VHFcontesting] 6m Array Switching (score: 1)
Author: "David A. Pruett" <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 03 Jul 2004 22:41:25 -0400
At 04:52 PM 7/3/04 -0400, Mike Clarson wrote: David: Is the "ground gain" a real number? When doing non-ionizing radiation calculations, (same thing, but usually in the transition zone between near f
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-07/msg00016.html (8,895 bytes)

27. Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL kills VHF, Should we let them? (score: 1)
Author: "David A. Pruett" <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Jul 2004 23:34:57 -0400
Guys, it sure seems like you're getting all excited without any facts in hand. I guess I can't blame you, since the ARRL put out what might be considered a provocative questionare, followed by silenc
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-07/msg00106.html (10,802 bytes)

28. Re: [VHFcontesting] DEM 2m Transverter (144-28CK) Kit (score: 1)
Author: "David A. Pruett" <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2004 23:50:45 -0400
Jason, I put together my 144-28CK a couple of years ago. It's not all that hard but IMHO its not for a beginner. The trickiest tasks are winding several small diameter air-wound coils and getting the
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-08/msg00048.html (9,120 bytes)

29. Re: [VHFcontesting] Roving and Hamfests (score: 1)
Author: "David A. Pruett" <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 01 Sep 2004 23:33:00 -0400
At 08:15 PM 8/31/04 -0400, Jimk8mr@aol.com wrote: The September VHF QSO Party happens to coincide with two of the better hamfests in my area, Butler, PA (FN00) to the east of us, and Findlay, OH (EN8
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00008.html (8,902 bytes)

30. RE: [VHFcontesting] Elecraft XV144 QST Review Online (score: 1)
Author: "David A. Pruett" <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 03 Sep 2004 23:37:04 -0400
Why not buy the 902 model, and if you need to work someone on 903, just shift the IF radio up a megahertz? I would'nt think that there would be any bandwidth issues with either a 28 or 144 MHz IF. Da
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00022.html (9,263 bytes)

31. Re: [VHFcontesting] Roving and Hamfests (score: 1)
Author: "David A. Pruett" <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 04 Sep 2004 00:06:14 -0400
The basic fundamental tenet of an amateur radio contest is that you initiate your QSOs via radio techniques. This has been re-affirmed by most of the major organizations that sponsor radio contests.
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00024.html (13,078 bytes)

32. Re: [VHFcontesting] Downsizing my Rover station (score: 1)
Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 25 Dec 2005 00:35:45 -0500
Dan, Define DC-to-daylight. An IC-706MkIIG or FT100 only gives you one extra band (432) over the IC-746 and 3dB less power on 144. The only thing better is a FT-736R or TS-2000, the latter of which c
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-12/msg00024.html (9,568 bytes)

33. Re: [VHFcontesting] K3EGE and W3EFH on 6 bands for the contest (score: 1)
Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Jan 2006 00:06:27 -0500
I may be wrong on this, but I don't think the ARRL will accept scores from two separate rover entries utilizing the common equipment in the same vehicle. _____________________________________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-01/msg00069.html (8,155 bytes)

34. [VHFcontesting] Fwd: Re: K3EGE and W3EFH on 6 bands for the contest (score: 1)
Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2006 23:51:27 -0500
My apologies to K3EGE and W3EFH for mistakenly concluding they were rovers. Operating multiple family calls from a single fixed station is certainly allowed by the ARRL rules. Dave/K8CC _____________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-01/msg00079.html (7,594 bytes)

35. Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL Contest Robot and 903 mhz Q's (score: 1)
Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:02:45 -0500
At 09:25 AM 1/30/2006, Kenneth E. Harker responded: Let's see: - I write a widely used logging program which was one of the first to support Cabrillo. - I'm on the ARRL Contest Advisory Committee - I
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-01/msg00128.html (10,246 bytes)

36. Re: [VHFcontesting] W9ZRX June VHF Contest (Long) (score: 1)
Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2006 17:32:22 -0400
Jim, A couple of us here in the Detroit area have aluminum towers mounted on modified boat trailers which use the "falling derrick" method. We use three-way guying, and one of the guys is the line wh
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-06/msg00292.html (10,792 bytes)

37. Re: [VHFcontesting] impedance transformer (score: 1)
Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 18:40:52 -0400
Group, ZD Engineering was run by Paul Darwactor, W8ZD out of Findlay, OH. Not to put words in his mouth, but I don't think he is making matching transformers any more. (I used to see his display ever
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-07/msg00135.html (9,570 bytes)

38. Re: [VHFcontesting] impedance transformer (score: 1)
Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 20:30:50 -0400
Paul, While the technique you describe certainly works, it has the downside that as the line becomes longer in terms of wavelengths (so that it contains more and more 1/2 wavelength sections), the ba
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-07/msg00139.html (10,234 bytes)

39. Re: [VHFcontesting] Optium antenna height (score: 1)
Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 18:15:16 -0500
John, It's been my experience that there are two answers to the question: 50 MHz, and the other higher bands. On 50 MHz, I think the key is to match the radiation angle of the antenna to the incoming
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-11/msg00114.html (10,030 bytes)

40. Re: [VHFcontesting] LOTW general log question (score: 1)
Author: David Pruett <k8cc@comcast.net>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 10:42:45 -0500
Kevin, I've loaded every QSO made from my current QTH (something approaching 300K QSOs), both HF and VHF, contest and non-contest, and never had LoTW ask for a contest type. I suspect this is because
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-12/msg00035.html (8,107 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu