Hi everyone, While there have already been a few requests answered by the "community" (which I definitely appreciate as one of the sponsors and I'm pretty confident I can say that Steve feels the sam
I CAN confirm that "1.2G" worked for 1296 QSOs. I can ALSO CONFIRM that the robot says "I do not recognize 'FM' as a valid mode." EVEN THOUGH the Cabrillo QSO-template at http://www.kkn.net/~trey/cab
One more piece to the puzzle... That SAME text: has been IN the rules since 2000 as best as I can tell, (I have the pdf files of the rules going back to 2003 but, using the 'Wayback Machine" at archi
And YET ANOTHER piece to the puzzle... That SAME text: is ALSO in the CQ WW >>DX<< Contest Rules. Thanks to the Wayback Machine again, I checked and saw it in 2000 and 2004. Any "DX Contesters" out t
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 15:24:01 -0700, Kenny K2KW wrote: This rule has been in the CQWW HF rules for some time. The intent was to stop people from using remote receivers or remote stations in ADDITION t
Hello VHFcontesting readers, Further to Duffey's note about submitting logs for this year's UHF Contest. First thanks to ALL who participated, whether you submitted your log or not. The 200 log submi
Hello VHF Contest-land, Looking at Hepburn's forecast graphics, it looks like potential for some "slight" tropospheric enhancement in the area of the southern Great Lakes this evening, particularly a
Geez, all these comments about "why" and "what were they thinking" on Limited Rover changes. BUT HOW ABOUT Item #2! C'mon clubs, let's get your teams rallied! WHO will be the FIRST "Unlimited" Club i
Echoing Bill's comment to VHFContesting (though ALSO 'guilty' about NOT posting any plans myself ;-( ). Not to mention my HOPE that last year's excellent log submission count might be exceeded...250
While I don't see a specific "bar" to counting such a contact in the SVHFS's Rules (other than the challenge of the ISS figuring out which Grid to report), I'd note that, in the "General Rules for AR
Results from my Rove in the Chicago area were a bit better than other reports. 61 QSOs from 4 Grids visited, Score is 557 per the SVHFS Rover Scoring method. 33 different calls in the log, 3 of them
In reply to Jim, K9GTJ's query: I beg to differ. While submitting a Single-Op Log IN ADDITION to a Rover Log IS allowed in ARRL Contests (Above 50 MHz Rule 2.3.6); when I last checked, the CQ WW VHF
Mine arrived in today's mail. I SECOND John's comment...VERY NICE! as well as asking that thanks and appreciation be passed along to Sue and David in the Graphics Department for their efforts in maki
Primarily for Paul KE1LIFN41 but leaving the list copied, expecting that others might be interested or have some additional ideas. This can be done using KML within Google Maps. Here's a link to a Go
With April 1st almost upon us, is it time to resurrect the Press Release announcing the Yaesu FT-958R? ;-) ;-) Seriously though, is there knowledge among the group of what component(s) is(are) the ty
Jon Platt, W0ZQ wrote (in part): Besides Reverse VUCC (or VUCC/R as the Society also calls it), Central States VHF Society ALSO sponsors an award for "Annual" VHF & Up activity...everyone starts anew
Posting on behalf of Steve Bolia, N8BJQ, Contest Director. Remember that the deadline for submitting logs to be eligible for award consideration in this year's CQ WW VHF Contest is this coming Sunday
If anyone else has already posted this, I missed it. The Southeast VHF Society has announced the dates for the Fall VHF & Up Sprint series they sponsor, which, as they started in 2012, has moved the
And Bruce, KI7JA replied: I guess I shouldn't complain about making 'only' 48 QSOs from my rover (the CoROVERolla), then. Sorry to hear that activity was so dismal for Pete in SoCal and for Bruce in
Never saw this reflected yesterday...trying again. --jk Sending this on be half of Steve's, following up on the e-mail he sent Friday - he tried to send the message immediately below earlier today bu