Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:ka5cvh@ka5cvh.com: 52 ]

Total 52 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Rover antenna question (score: 1)
Author: ka5cvh@ka5cvh.com (Mike (KA5CVH) Urich)
Date: Fri Aug 1 16:12:03 2003
Go to qrz.com and put in K5UHF. You'd be better off doing a google search http://www.google.com and search on K5UHF. The first hit will produce http://www.k5rmg.org/k5uhf.html and since everyone is s
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-08/msg00010.html (7,783 bytes)

2. [VHFcontesting] how to improve FD score (score: 1)
Author: ka5cvh@ka5cvh.com (Mike Urich)
Date: Fri Jul 4 11:43:04 2003
I ran the VHF/UHF station for several hours during field day. After every Q, I asked for other bands and for CW Q's. Out of 150 q's on 6/2/432, I was able to manage 8 CW contacts as none of the stati
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00010.html (8,520 bytes)

3. [VHFcontesting] Re: VHF/UHF Rigs . . . (score: 1)
Author: ka5cvh@ka5cvh.com (Mike Urich)
Date: Mon Jul 7 21:29:58 2003
Why were there no comments on the Yeasu 736R? I'm happy with mine on the bands through 70 cm. Maybe I'm just easy to please. I am more than satisfied with my FT-736R. Mine has 50/144/430 and want to
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00030.html (7,394 bytes)

4. [VHFcontesting] 6 meter yagi (score: 1)
Author: ka5cvh@ka5cvh.com (Mike Urich)
Date: Wed Jul 9 22:11:36 2003
Yes, I posting to three reflectors so please don't flame me. I'm going to try to build a new 6 meter yagi for the contest next week end. I'm only going with two elements for space considerations. I'm
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00039.html (7,771 bytes)

5. [VHFcontesting] 6 meter yagi (score: 1)
Author: ka5cvh@ka5cvh.com (Mike Urich)
Date: Thu Jul 10 17:24:51 2003
If you're interested in an antenna where you get your materials from the local DIY store, you should check out a Moxon Rectangle that I built. It's about 7' wide and less than 2' deep and made out of
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00046.html (8,095 bytes)

6. [VHFcontesting] State QSO Parties as a VHF Contest Model (score: 1)
Author: ka5cvh@ka5cvh.com (Mike (KA5CVH) Urich)
Date: Sun Jul 13 10:16:47 2003
I can't help but think that if FM oriented clubs would get involved we could entice some repeater/appliance type operators to at least try simplex operation. In many metropolitan areas dozens, perhap
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00060.html (8,663 bytes)

7. [VHFcontesting] Re: [VHF] Re: The CQWW-VHF Contest, and TheRover Resource Page (score: 1)
Author: ka5cvh@ka5cvh.com (Mike (KA5CVH) Urich)
Date: Sun Jul 13 14:25:23 2003
An example of how *not* to animate a website. I don't know ... I suppose it would depend upon what type of an internet connection you have. My son is a CMS programmer for LeTourneau Univ in Longview
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00062.html (8,453 bytes)

8. [VHFcontesting] Stacking Distance? (score: 1)
Author: ka5cvh@ka5cvh.com (Mike (KA5CVH) Urich)
Date: Tue Jul 15 11:06:39 2003
Oh yeah, while I have your attention is there a 432 or 435 simplex fm freq that is used for contesting? I have a new duo band fm antenna but won't have anything else for the sept.contest. Again, this
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00076.html (7,605 bytes)

9. [VHFcontesting] REMINDER:CQWW VHF Contest and CU2QSO Pioneers (score: 1)
Author: ka5cvh@ka5cvh.com (Mike (KA5CVH) Urich)
Date: Fri Jul 18 18:50:39 2003
In this case you have gathered the information on your own with no outside help. The other station is basically sending CQ in digital mode, You have picked up that CQ via your own radio and your comp
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00091.html (7,481 bytes)

10. [VHFcontesting] REMINDER:CQWW VHF Contest and CU2QSO Pioneers (score: 1)
Author: ka5cvh@ka5cvh.com (Mike (KA5CVH) Urich)
Date: Sun Jul 20 19:39:47 2003
Maybe the ARRL Contest Desk needs to look at this again... I've been trying to get warm and fuzzy with this concept. In some ways I don't see it much different than programming a voice recorder with
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00102.html (10,303 bytes)

11. [VHFcontesting] CU2QSO users (score: 1)
Author: ka5cvh@ka5cvh.com (Mike (KA5CVH) Urich)
Date: Mon Jul 21 19:33:49 2003
It would seem to me that this mode is going to have to prove itself among users in real life. I really don't have a clue how many rovers are going to invest in putting another radio, tnc, gps & compu
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00134.html (6,953 bytes)

12. [VHFcontesting] CQ Test and Hill Topping (score: 1)
Author: ka5cvh@ka5cvh.com (Mike (KA5CVH) Urich)
Date: Mon Jul 21 19:54:09 2003
Anyone else try out the "Hilltopping" category? I did a stint on Saturday and sure picked the wrong six hours--worked only 14 stations and eight grids on 6 and no one on two. Then, while editting the
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00135.html (8,257 bytes)

13. [VHFcontesting] Low power (score: 1)
Author: ka5cvh@ka5cvh.com (Mike (KA5CVH) Urich)
Date: Tue Jul 22 15:12:38 2003
Looking forward to Sept ... Is 150 watts or less still considered low power or has that changed? Mike Urich, KA5CVH www.ka5cvh.com http://www.ka5cvh.com/vhf/vhfindex.htm
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00145.html (6,407 bytes)

14. [VHFcontesting] Fishing for FM contacts (score: 1)
Author: ka5cvh@ka5cvh.com (Mike (KA5CVH) Urich)
Date: Tue Jul 22 15:49:20 2003
http://www.arrl.org/contests/announcements/rules-vhf.html 1.9.Only recognized FM simplex frequencies may be used, such as 144.90 to 145.00; 146.49, .55 and .58, and 147.42, .45, .48, .51, .54 and .57
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00146.html (7,039 bytes)

15. [VHFcontesting] Fishing for FM contacts (score: 1)
Author: ka5cvh@ka5cvh.com (Mike (KA5CVH) Urich)
Date: Tue Jul 22 17:28:41 2003
One would also think that frequencies such as 146.565 could be used - I would think so as well, especially if you're going to play with CU2QSO. I still think that 145.500 - 145.800 is the "perfect" s
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00148.html (7,197 bytes)

16. [VHFcontesting] Hold your calls (was) Low Power (score: 1)
Author: ka5cvh@ka5cvh.com (Mike (KA5CVH) Urich)
Date: Tue Jul 22 17:57:59 2003
I got my answer folks. I was poking around and had missed that page. Mike
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00149.html (6,437 bytes)

17. [VHFcontesting] REMINDER:CQWW VHF Contest and CU2QSO Pioneers (score: 1)
Author: ka5cvh@ka5cvh.com (Mike Urich)
Date: Wed Jul 23 21:59:54 2003
I tend to agree, however, I am of the opinion that if you beaconing with a digital mode then your initial contact SHOULD be digital to digital. At which time you can agree to QSY anywhere you darn we
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00155.html (10,315 bytes)

18. [VHFcontesting] Change the subject (score: 1)
Author: ka5cvh@ka5cvh.com (Mike (KA5CVH) Urich)
Date: Mon Jul 28 16:15:45 2003
OK ... everyone has flexed their IT muscles. What's on your plates for the Sept VHF QSO party? I'm working to try and get our "hamsters" and other "newbies" on the air at least on FM if nothing else.
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00213.html (7,144 bytes)

19. [VHFcontesting] Captive rovers (score: 1)
Author: ka5cvh@ka5cvh.com (Mike (KA5CVH) Urich)
Date: Mon Jul 28 20:25:02 2003
As long as they were valid contacts-Both exchanges sent/received on a legal amateur frequency-how can I have a problem with it? They have followed the rules of the contest Mike agrees However if they
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00227.html (8,207 bytes)

20. [VHFcontesting] Captive rovers (score: 1)
Author: ka5cvh@ka5cvh.com (Mike (KA5CVH) Urich)
Date: Mon Jul 28 20:29:00 2003
Yeah, but do you really want a rule stating that you must work everyone you hear? Oh heavens no! ... Besides how could you prove it? Mike Urich www.ka5cvh.com www.ka5cvh.com/democracy.htm
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00229.html (8,573 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu