Mail Archive Search: <+from:kdcarlso@gmail.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:kdcarlso@gmail.com: 24 ]

Total 24 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [VHFcontesting] Why a rule discriminating against portable stations? (score: 1): Author: Dave <kdcarlso@gmail.com>; Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2023 15:15:04 -0400; I would support it, After all, you aren't likely to post high scores in any one category when you divide your time, but do give opportunity to others to possibly work new multipliers. I never underst; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2023-06/msg00049.html (11,089 bytes)
22. Re: [VHFcontesting] [Packrats] Contest suggestion (score: 1): Author: Dave <kdcarlso@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2024 16:07:59 -0400; I much prefer more points for analog modes. It's hard enough to get connected with rovers since they are usually time crunched. I can't imagine trying to work a 10 band rover or any station for that; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2024-09/msg00048.html (19,108 bytes)
23. Re: [VHFcontesting] Passing QSOs and WSJT-X Improved (score: 1): Author: Dave <kdcarlso@gmail.com>; Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2025 16:19:30 -0500; The latest release candidate, WSJT-X 2.7.0-rc8 also has it. I hope folks download it before the contest. It looks like it will help some. Dave N2OA _______________________________________________ VHF; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2025-01/msg00026.html (10,697 bytes)
24. Re: [VHFcontesting] [NEWSVHF] Here's a Proposed Solution for Digital/Analog Operating (score: 1): Author: Dave <kdcarlso@gmail.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Sep 2025 19:51:58 -0400; We go down the analog vs digital rabbit hole after every contest. I think everyone is overlooking the more important thing. How to get new blood into our part of the hobby. Everyone's discussing mode; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2025-09/msg00088.html (38,126 bytes)

Current List: 21 - 24
Page: [1] [2]