Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:n8hm@arrl.net: 14 ]

Total 14 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Logging cross-mode contacts (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 05 Aug 2012 15:29:54 -0400
All - I made a cross-mode QSO in the ARRL UHF Contest (other station was using SSB, but I had to reply in CW to complete the QSO). How do I enter this QSO in my Cabrillo file? Thanks and 73, Paul, N8
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-08/msg00014.html (6,933 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] FM-Only Frequencies? (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2012 11:41:33 -0500
The contest rules explicitly state that you cannot use the national simplex calling frequencies. I think it's a dumb rule, but it is a rule. 73, Paul, N8HM ___________________________________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2012-12/msg00011.html (10,589 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Trends in VHF/UHF Weak Signal Operating (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Sun, 9 Feb 2014 16:51:58 -0500
Two trends show a potential for a bright future for both VHF/UHF weak signal and satellite operating: the increasing number of hams in antenna restricted locations and perhaps an extended period of t
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-02/msg00018.html (12,068 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Supporting the Amateur Radio Parity Act of 2014 (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 10 Jul 2014 15:39:53 -0400
Congress has always had the power to nullify private contracts. States cannot, local governments cannot, but Congress can. 73, Paul, N8HM _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-07/msg00019.html (9,941 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] September VHF Certificate (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2015 19:15:48 -0400
I think Top Ten always receive certificates, even if they don't win their division or section. You were 9th overall. 73, Paul, N8HM _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting maili
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2015-08/msg00021.html (8,419 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] Map of worked 6m grids this past June VHF Contest? (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 7 Jul 2016 16:22:28 -0400
I only worked 44 grids with 100 watts to a dipole on my balcony, but I did whip up a quick map: https://twitter.com/PRStoetzer/status/742195635491885057 73, Paul, N8HM _______________________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-07/msg00009.html (8,383 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] Maidenhead grid locating for Rovers (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 09:54:34 -0400
There's an iPhone app named "Maidenhead" that shows your current grid. 73, Paul, N8HM _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://li
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-05/msg00052.html (8,582 bytes)

8. Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL June VHF - modes (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2017 08:54:23 -0400
I tried to eliminate the signal report on one of my QSOs as it's not required for the contest. Unfortunately, that just confused the person I was working. 73, Paul, N8HM _____________________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-06/msg00079.html (10,521 bytes)

9. Re: [VHFcontesting] 50.276 (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2017 12:02:32 -0400
This has been great and I've been able to work lots of new stuff on 6 meters with a dipole on my south facing balcony. The big advantage is being able to make QSOs while I work. Even if I'm on the ph
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-06/msg00091.html (8,852 bytes)

10. Re: [VHFcontesting] High Sierra Microwave (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2018 12:15:34 -0400
Convenience for the circuit design? It's designed to be used with an SDR, so it doesn't really matter where the IF is. I've purchased two preamps from them. They work great. 73, Paul, N8HM __________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-03/msg00010.html (10,097 bytes)

11. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT 8 on 2M (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2018 13:41:57 -0400
Remember that if a beacon station in the United States is automatically controlled, it may only operate in the following segments: 28.20-28.30 MHz, 50.06-50.08 MHz, 144.275-144.300 MHz, 222.05-222.06
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-08/msg00044.html (10,256 bytes)

12. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] 5BVUCC Nets Support of (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 17:46:24 -0400
Yes, I believe Satellite should be considered one of the 5 bands for this award. I doubt Les would have crossposted this to the AMSAT-BB if that were not his intent. I also think Satellite DXCCs shou
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-04/msg00085.html (12,939 bytes)

13. Re: [VHFcontesting] We're about to lose 3456 MHz band entirely (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 14:46:49 -0500
I believe this agenda item was released either late in the day on Thursday or early on Friday and I know the ARRL is already working on a strategy to address this NPRM. Remember that approval of the
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-11/msg00040.html (17,062 bytes)

14. Re: [VHFcontesting] Suggestion for the ARRL June VHF contest (score: 1)
Author: Paul Stoetzer <n8hm@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2022 19:54:44 -0400
The problem I have with this is that VHF awards and contests have always been mode agnostic and cross-mode QSOs are acceptable unlike on HF (Ive made a few long range QSOs calling a station in CW whi
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2022-10/msg00056.html (12,327 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu