Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:nate@natetech.com: 207 ]

Total 207 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] comments on proposed VHF+ rules changes (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Sat, 6 Mar 2004 23:37:42 -0700
Dear proposal committee, As someone who has only participated in two June contests grand-total after being invited to a friendly multi-op station (W0KVA - THANKS GUYS), and who would like to now buil
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-03/msg00032.html (11,366 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Sports vs. Radiosports (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Wed, 08 Sep 2004 14:58:45 -0600
Ev Tupis wrote: Ken is right that WRTC "real-time" scoring is a much different situation I hope I haven't misstated something along the way. I used WRTC2002 simply as an example of "out of the box" t
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-09/msg00085.html (9,589 bytes)

3. [VHFcontesting] June DN70 - W0KVA (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Thu, 26 May 2005 21:20:20 -0600
Multi-op station W0KVA (Kilowatts, Volts, and Amps) will be operating 6m through 10G from DN70 this year. (With the likely hole of 222, the radio's unhappy... and depending on how lazy we get about a
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-05/msg00101.html (6,856 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] FSK/digital modes (was: Re: VHF Contesting:Fixing the Grid Circling) (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2005 20:36:32 -0600
So if I load JT-65 software I'll magically get contacts with places I can not reach via propagation? I don't think so. This post sounds more like sour grapes than well thought out. If the band's not
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00114.html (9,499 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] How to increase my score, or why should I try? (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 21:47:58 -0600
There's a controversy because people enjoy controversy. Turn on the nightly news, if you don't believe that one. If the so-called "problems" of today's contests were magically "fixed", someone here w
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00146.html (9,929 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] What about me? I am captive. (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 17:21:07 -0600
Tim Ertl (KE3HT) wrote: What is a captive rover? I gather this from discussion on this list: I schedule ahead of the contest with only two or three stations. My June logs (available on my web site) w
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00311.html (11,304 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF happenings (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2005 12:20:22 -0600
Ahh, the League is using this technique: http://images.ucomics.com/comics/nq/2005/nq050906.gif Nate WY0X _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@conte
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-09/msg00193.html (7,596 bytes)

8. Re: [VHFcontesting] Survey Results - Contest Software (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2006 17:02:37 -0700
[comparisons of various logging software snipped...] Rob, "Supports computer networking" and..."Recovers correctly from loss of computer networking"... Are definitely two different things. Has anyone
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-01/msg00036.html (7,785 bytes)

9. Re: [VHFcontesting] KB0HH prelim. report (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:36:45 -0700
W0EEA always has a nice signal. I forgot to turn on AGC on my FT-857 in the Jeep and had a head scratcher moment wondering why all the big guns sounded horrible and the weak-signals sounded good. ;-)
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-01/msg00082.html (8,618 bytes)

10. Re: [VHFcontesting] KB0HH prelim. report (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 14:15:00 -0700
Yes! I forgot him in the list! I worked him! Nate WY0X _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/list
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-01/msg00083.html (7,327 bytes)

11. Re: [VHFcontesting] K7RAT Two Meter Spring Sprint (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Fri, 07 Apr 2006 19:28:32 -0600
Guilty as charged. You can beat me with a Wouff Hong if you like. We don't do it for long, unless you consider a couple of minutes maximum "long"... and if so, you need less coffee. :-) The key in yo
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00091.html (15,882 bytes)

12. Re: [VHFcontesting] Contest Tweaks? (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2006 15:30:38 -0600
As others have said, I fall into the "leave it alone" camp too... but just to pick a nit... Your stated "object" above is NOT the stated object of the June VHF contest. The first line in the rules: 1
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00108.html (9,698 bytes)

13. [VHFcontesting] Where would you send someone new to VHF contesting? (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Sun, 09 Apr 2006 15:44:58 -0600
So assuming there's a bunch (or a few) new folks around who want to join in the contest fun this season... I figured I'd take a look at the official contest website to see what kind of information I
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00109.html (9,023 bytes)

14. Re: [VHFcontesting] Contest Tweaks? (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Apr 2006 14:04:44 -0600
The opposite holds true also, if enough microwave activity is happening in an area, but not enough general V/U activity to keep the band busy (see my comments about the ragchewing... we took that dis
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00123.html (10,374 bytes)

15. Re: [VHFcontesting] Best contesting rig (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 10:35:45 -0600
John, You talking fixed or rover? I think the choices for most of us would be quite different for each, for our "dream setup on a budget" since space and power might be at a premium in most rover's s
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00202.html (8,738 bytes)

16. Re: [VHFcontesting] 6m Spring Sprints (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Sun, 14 May 2006 16:03:03 -0600
Bruce, Glad you were out there. I was going to participate as another rover last night until I got called into work. :-( Nate WY0X _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailin
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-05/msg00026.html (8,464 bytes)

17. Re: [VHFcontesting] Dates for 2006 ARRL EME Contest (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 10:09:50 -0600
They can just point their arrays down to find us Rovers... We move faster (in relative motion) than the moon, and present a better moving-target type of challenge! Nate WY0X/R <-- Going to have to ge
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-05/msg00048.html (7,377 bytes)

18. [VHFcontesting] ARRL June VHF QSO Party WY0X/r (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 16:13:17 -0600
With HUGE thanks to Scott W0KU, Scott W0KVA, and John N0WBW of the W0KVA multi-op team, WY0X/R will be roving Colorado, Wyoming, Nebraska, and Kansas with the following bands: 50 MHz - 100W 2x W0KVA
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-06/msg00053.html (8,619 bytes)

19. Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL June VHF QSO Party WY0X/r (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2006 16:16:07 -0600
Typo. http://www.rmham.org Sorry, Nate WY0X/r _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfc
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-06/msg00054.html (6,867 bytes)

20. [VHFcontesting] June VHF QSO Party - WY0X/R (really long) (score: 1)
Author: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2006 02:53:33 -0600
ARRL June VHF QSO Party Call: WY0X/R Operator(s): WY0X Station: WY0X/R Class: Rover LP QTH: Operating Time (hrs): Summary: Band QSOs Mults -- 6: 374 117 2: 54 13 222: 23 4 432: 45 9 903: 13 8 1.2: 22
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-06/msg00126.html (31,079 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu