Well, I have to get my .02 cents in or maybe a dollar with tariffs and inflation. I op'ed 222 and 432 for our contest efforts allowing others 6 and 2 meters. I echo Dave's comments about band conditi
Well, I said make the contest a full 48 hrs, 24 digital and 24 analog. Comments about too many modes is kinda correct, you don't know where to go. You call CQ on SSB/CW and you miss FT8 folks, go to
While I like that idea, whichever mode is split, those folks will complain I fear. If Rovers go out for the mode that's split that wouldn't work. I will admit just operating FT8 on a single radio is
When using high side injection, sidebands are reversed and tuning is backwards. We found this back in the 90's when we first got on 10GHz using 12 GHz Cal Micowave LOs. A 94 MHz LO is bo problem 144-
Dave, The intent is to ONLY allow one mode per 24hrs. At the end, you switch modes and start over. There would not be mode hoping, just band hoping which has been forever. Think of it as two separate
902 and 3400 are already are covered by DEMI and SG-LABS Terry Price - W8ZN Directive Systems and Engineering 703-754-3876 _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list V
For some reason, FT4 just has not taken off like FT8, maybe money see monkey do?!?!? When you can find folks on FT4, it is much faster but still not as fast as cw/SSB. Terry Price - W8ZN Directive Sy
I use SG-LABs with my 905 and without a 10MHz reference they are more than stable. If you want to lock them, take the 10MHz reference from the 905 and run it to DEMI 10-4, which you would need anyway
I believe there is growing support for Q65, it seems to handle multipath better than FT8 Terry Price - W8ZN Directive Systems and Engineering _______________________________________________ VHFcontes
Hi Mike, Any 220 module parts or 1295 module parts? Terry Price - W8ZN Directive Systems and Engineering 703-754-3876 _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcon