Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:tree@kkn.net: 147 ]

Total 147 documents matching your query.

101. Re: [VHFcontesting] The Rover Resource Page updated! (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 13:12:51 -0500
There are two schools of thought here. It sort of gets down to putting the emphasis on VHF or CONTEST. In most contests, you can decide if your entry will be a single-op entry (where the operator rec
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-06/msg00037.html (9,097 bytes)

102. Re: [VHFcontesting] Available records (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 17:24:25 -0500
However, there was a documented QSO with VY1JA at the start of the June contest a couple of years ago. The band was actually open from the Pacific Northwest at the start of the contest and a CW QSO
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-06/msg00039.html (8,252 bytes)

103. Re: [VHFcontesting] ARRL kills VHF, Should we let them? (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Mon, 19 Jul 2004 16:40:36 -0500
I'll offer a real practical example of this. About eight years ago, a group of people designed a new contest for the other end of the spectrum (160 meters). This contest became known as the Stew Perr
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-07/msg00070.html (11,211 bytes)

104. Re: [VHFcontesting] OT: HF Contests and WARC Bands (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 15:43:16 -0800
It was generally agreed when they became available to leave them untouched by contesting. Part of this was a desire to provide a sanctuary for those who are displaced when a major contest hits the ot
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-11/msg00008.html (7,083 bytes)

105. Re: [VHFcontesting] OT: HF Contests and WARC Bands (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 16:36:30 -0800
These are also good reasons. off limits to contesting. I am sure it will be so. Tree _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lis
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2004-11/msg00010.html (7,942 bytes)

106. Re: [VHFcontesting] IRLP Contest???? (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2005 12:45:41 -0800
Can we use packet spotting? Can I used EchoLink to set up skeds? Can we apply the Sprint QSY rule? Tree N6TR tree@kkn.net _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VH
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-03/msg00014.html (8,262 bytes)

107. Re: [VHFcontesting] Biat Tee return loss (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 10:56:35 -0700
The amount of power reflected from either the input or output. The higher the number - the closer to a 1:1 SWR you are seeing. Tree _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting maili
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-04/msg00025.html (6,793 bytes)

108. Re: [VHFcontesting] Biat Tee return loss (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Tue, 12 Apr 2005 11:39:26 -0700
Imagine that you have a perfect load on the output of the device. Put a directional wattmeter on the input and put some power through it. The return loss is essentially the difference between the inp
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-04/msg00027.html (8,239 bytes)

109. Re: [VHFcontesting] FM (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2005 11:24:58 -0700
In the general rules for ARRL VHF contests - there are the following restrictions: 1.7 Retransmitting either or both signals, or use of repeater frequencies, is not permitted. 1.7.1 This prohibits us
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-05/msg00125.html (7,823 bytes)

110. Re: [VHFcontesting] Submitting to ARRL Robot (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2005 15:48:12 -0700
Your question really should be: "What does one have to do with CT Version 10.something to produce the Cabrillo log forward the ARRL requires." Tree _______________________________________________ VHF
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-06/msg00098.html (6,676 bytes)

111. Re: [VHFcontesting] Multi-op rovers (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 10:50:03 -0700
I think there is a category that already exists for the grid circling rovers. Check Log. The whole idea really is revolting. Sure, the rules let you go create a big score by operating this way - but
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00002.html (6,960 bytes)

112. Re: [VHFcontesting] Multi-op rovers (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 12:34:27 -0700
I would be very surprised if they made 1% of their QSOs outside of their group. I don't buy this. The #1 objective is to work the other guys in the group as quickly as possible, so everyone can move
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00007.html (9,230 bytes)

113. [VHFcontesting] Estimate of QSOs made outside grid circling rover (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 12:59:12 -0700
Here are the line scores from last year's June VHF contest. N6NB 1,292,382 1,804 263 R WTX (+KG6TOA) N6VI 1,156,760 1,744 239 R WTX N6MU 1,131,156 1,738 234 R WTX If you make an assumption that N6VI
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00008.html (6,917 bytes)

114. Re: [VHFcontesting] Multi-op rovers (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 21:33:52 -0700
I think I do understand the mentality of a contester. Yup - which is why we need to change the rules. Sure - change the rules... I think this type of operation should be discouraged - as opposed to
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00013.html (9,574 bytes)

115. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF Contesting: Fixing the Grid Circling Problem (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 08:27:59 -0700
I think we need to decide what problem we are trying to solve. If we are just trying to eliminate the grid circling behavior, there is a very easy rule that I can think of to do this. It also would
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00030.html (8,343 bytes)

116. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF Contesting: Fixing the Grid Circling Problem (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2005 22:51:44 -0700
Exactly. No need to change anything. Bzzt - you are making it too complicated. The simple rule will solve the problem and no more words are needed. Only 3 people would as far as I can tell - since i
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00038.html (8,501 bytes)

117. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF Contesting: Fixing the Grid Circling Problem (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Fri, 5 Aug 2005 08:43:26 -0700
Sorry - I should point out that we are pretty much in agreement about the criteria. I just don't want someone spending a lot of time figuring out what the formula should be ahead of time and trying
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00047.html (10,118 bytes)

118. [VHFcontesting] Captive rover not working you (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 07:28:15 -0700
I was lucky enough to have dinner with N7NG, manager of membership services who manages the contest department. I asked him about the captive rovers not working you -- and he said that was illegal pe
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00060.html (7,838 bytes)

119. Re: [VHFcontesting] Captive rover not working you (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 23:38:51 -0700
No - but if someone is calling you and you decide not to answer because you are only working the "mother station" - I would call that unsportsmanlike - and it is even illegal. Tree __________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00070.html (7,655 bytes)

120. Re: [VHFcontesting] Fixing the Captive Rover Problem [was: FixingtheGrid Circling Problem] (score: 1)
Author: Tree <tree@kkn.net>
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2005 23:40:50 -0700
C'mon Jim - it is simple. You see three logs that have 98 percent of the QSOs with each other. However, I believe it will never come to that. Who would orgainize it just to have it thrown out? The ru
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2005-08/msg00071.html (7,560 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu