Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w2ev@arrl.net: 243 ]

Total 243 documents matching your query.

21. [VHFcontesting] Just one more option [was: Why we participate...] (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jul 24 23:39:12 2003
Your last sentence says it all. No one weapon in any arsenal is enough to make a successful contest operation (however the individual operator defines "success"). It is up to each person to examine t
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00177.html (8,917 bytes)

22. [VHFcontesting] Re: CU2QSO (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Fri Jul 25 00:14:28 2003
I've shared my motivation in previous emails, Joe. I do this because i love radiosports and want others to enjoy them, too. This has nothing to do with club competition, though I may use that to moti
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00178.html (8,608 bytes)

23. [VHFcontesting] This Thread's Wrap-up (Promise) [was: Why we participate...] (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Fri Jul 25 01:19:53 2003
Why do I keep getting snarled up in this thing? <again, slapping myself on the fun. <grin> You continue to misunderstand CU2QSO...there is no assistance involved. There is no need to include CU2QSO i
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00181.html (11,020 bytes)

24. [VHFcontesting] PropNET vs. CU2QSO (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Fri Jul 25 19:58:10 2003
Hi Bill, You took a wrong turn. What you hyperlinked to was PropNET (a new propagation tracking system). Try again, but this time, click on CU2QSO instead. Both systems place all users on the same fr
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00193.html (8,597 bytes)

25. [VHFcontesting] re: Captive rovers (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Tue Jul 29 07:41:14 2003
Obvious Man asks... Is this really a question that one would expect from a sitting member of the CAC? I ask from ignorance. Nothing more. <scratching my head>, Evhen Tupis, W2EV
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00240.html (8,302 bytes)

26. [VHFcontesting] re: Captive rovers (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Tue Jul 29 08:06:07 2003
This is a little like the question, "How long have you beat your wife?". It assumes that it is happening; and simply asking the question is prejorative. In this case, it assumes that Captive rovering
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00241.html (9,636 bytes)

27. [VHFcontesting] Captive Rovers: Defined (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Tue Jul 29 18:16:40 2003
-- Captive Rover -- 1. A term applied to any mobile contest operation that one feels is the cause for one's own lack of ability to compete. 2. Mythological terminology. 3. A nemisis that everyone bel
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00285.html (6,511 bytes)

28. [VHFcontesting] captive rovers = Red Herring (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Wed Jul 30 07:08:31 2003
Unfortunately, George's example was one of mathmatics, not an example of what has actually happened. While an interesting read, it simply serves as a "heads up" of potential impact not proof of anyth
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00296.html (10,610 bytes)

29. [VHFcontesting] How to Captivate a Rover (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Wed Jul 30 21:22:41 2003
I will share this publicly, because I know that no Rover subscribed to the list will, for fear of the repercussions. What you are about to read is the honest truth. Choose to believe it and prosper i
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00321.html (8,447 bytes)

30. [VHFcontesting] Unique QSO's (was Captive Rovers) (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Wed Jul 30 21:39:22 2003
Actually, this is a good point. Let's take it back one more step, though. Are "Unique QSO's" (changing the term to better reflect the inquiry) a factor in winning for anyone? After all...this isn't j
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00322.html (8,814 bytes)

31. [VHFcontesting] How to Captivate a Rover (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Wed Jul 30 22:03:22 2003
The problem is that we never blame ourselves for our own shortcomings. In this case Rovers really DO want to work other stations...but those other stations don't make it very easy to do so. Here's a
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-07/msg00324.html (8,736 bytes)

32. [VHFcontesting] Re: [RVHFG] TS-2000 and BEACOnet (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:31 2003
The TS-2000 will work fine with BEACONet. Bummer on thinking about parting with the Omni 6. That is one very wonderful piece of equipment that few others can compete against for raw specification. Ev
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00397.html (8,247 bytes)

33. [VHFcontesting] In Support! [was: Fw: SM reports and contest results in QST] (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:43:58 2003
I am in support of the ARRL proposal to eliminate *detailed* contest results from QST provided: o The $100,000 per year would be publicly reallocated to a project that furthers the interests of our h
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00540.html (8,162 bytes)

34. [VHFcontesting] Re: SWOT Contest Plaques and Certificates (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:02 2003
I'm not certain that everyone knows that SWOT took the time to sponsor these awards for submitted logs in the January VHF Sweepstakes. My hat is off to them as they continue to attempt to drum-up in
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg00879.html (8,223 bytes)

35. [VHFcontesting] June VHF and UHF contests QST results available (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:30 2003
Two things that annoy me lately... o People who "imply information to fit their agenda" o Lame websites On the topic of the first... What the ARRL decided was that they could redirect $100,000 a year
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01117.html (9,593 bytes)

36. [VHFcontesting] June VHF and UHF contests QST results available (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:30 2003
Hi Bob, I will add N5NJ to my list of public appologies. In attempting to add a little gradeschool humor (where the terms "suck" and "lame" are bantied about with great abandon) to my frustration, I
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01119.html (8,719 bytes)

37. [VHFcontesting] Re: eham & contesting.com web sites (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:30 2003
Hi Dan, Unfortunate for me, your reply is based on a single out-of-context message that went to VHFcontesting@contesting.com. My *original* communication (and all of the followup stuff clarifying thi
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01132.html (9,724 bytes)

38. [VHFcontesting] Why do you ... (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:38 2003
... contest? o It's fun o There's a perceived reward of some sort ... submit a log? o It's easy to do o Doing so supports one of the reasons for "Why do you contest?" above The real question is this:
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01494.html (7,970 bytes)

39. [VHFcontesting] Why do you ... (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:38 2003
Gene, Certainly the "top 10" station's logs have been Cabrillo submitted for several years. Wouldn't it prove useful to examine them to see if the trend you believe is occuring is in evidence there?
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01502.html (9,764 bytes)

40. [VHFcontesting] W3ZZ's QST Contesting Article (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:38 2003
This is a question that should be asked of those that operated, and didn't submit a log. The problem is, we don't know what the "problem" is yet. Gene...is the problem fewer log submissions or fewer
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01503.html (9,040 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu