Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w2ev@arrl.net: 243 ]

Total 243 documents matching your query.

61. [VHFcontesting] More insights - Log Submittals (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:42 2003
There are three issues that this thread has engendered: o There is a perception that participation is on the decline o We are experiencing a decline in log submissions over the past decade o It is e
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01646.html (8,154 bytes)

62. [VHFcontesting] With all due respect... [was:Increasing submittedlogs] (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:43 2003
According to Steve Kerns (N3FTI) post to VHF@W6YZ... -- Have been following this thread for awhile... Gene Zimmerman ,W3ZZ (QST "World Above 50MHz" Editor) spoke last week at the Mt. Airy VHF Radio C
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01706.html (9,095 bytes)

63. [VHFcontesting] Re: September VHF Contest Results (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:35 2003
<rant snip> Followed by what appears to be an incredibly insightful observation by Jim (W7DHC): Tim, in the future, you may wish to add the following emails to your Cc: list... hollingworth@fcc.gov h
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01779.html (7,336 bytes)

64. [VHFcontesting] Re: Further statement on BeacoNet (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:36 2003
By the way... here are two items that may be of interest... o BEACONet's CU2QSO system (the one under discussion) was "killed" before it officially existed. It is in final pilot phase right now, with
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01802.html (7,987 bytes)

65. [VHFcontesting] question (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:36 2003
Hi Dave, BEACONet's CU2QSO system is simplex, unassisted and all-Amateur communications. APRS is not. See FAQ's on the website at http://www.BEACONet.org | CU2QSO for more interesting information. Re
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01805.html (8,410 bytes)

66. [VHFcontesting] question (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:36 2003
Having just replied to you personally, then seeing it was cc:'d to the list, my reply here will be much more succinct. ;-) You'll need to ask the ARRL about their banning of APRS. I cannot defend th
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01808.html (8,657 bytes)

67. [VHFcontesting] Beaconet - CU2QSO (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:36 2003
Let's not jump to conclusions. [[The following is not intended to provoke, but to expose the nerve that was unwittingly touched by the above: There's a difference between "this hasn't been really th
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01814.html (8,136 bytes)

68. [VHFcontesting] Beaconet - CU2QSO (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:36 2003
...snip... Sometimes the problem that needs solving isn't so much "in the box" as much as it is "in front of it". :o) <giggling> Ev, W2EV -- What's cool in Amateur Radio? http://www.BEACONet.org or j
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01815.html (7,534 bytes)

69. [VHFcontesting] Re: Contest Honor Rolls Completely Updated (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:36 2003
Well done, Tim! Nice piece of work. Ev, W2EV -- What's cool in Amateur Radio? http://www.BEACONet.org or join the on-line community by sending a blank eMail to: BEACONet-subscribe@yahoogroups.com
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01822.html (7,743 bytes)

70. [VHFcontesting] W2EV Rover -- Plans? You don't need no skinkin' plans! :o) (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:33 2003
W2EV will be roving around Southern Ontario Canada and Western New York. If you aren't in that area, then feel free to delete now. :o)) Bands: ABCD(E +IJK +P) Power: QRO (200+ watts ABCD, 80-watts E,
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01891.html (8,381 bytes)

71. [VHFcontesting] Re: Statement regarding the use of BEACONet in ARRL VHF Contests (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:33 2003
No one at the ARRL knows how BEACONet-for-Rovers works. As a result, such a decision or statement about it's use during VHF Contests is, at best, ill conceived. How do I know that no one knows enough
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01900.html (9,105 bytes)

72. [VHFcontesting] Re: [CQ-Contest] Re: Statement regarding the use ofBEACONet in ARRL VHF Contests (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (E. Tupis)
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:33 2003
One may carry on a full and complete keyboard-to-keyboard simplex, unassisted QSO in response to an operator noticing a the receipt of a BEACONet CQ. That is the truth of the matter. Thanks for takin
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg01907.html (8,386 bytes)

73. [VHFcontesting] Skeds (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:54 2003
While I realize this is probably referring to the setting up of WSJT schedules, my mind wandered to the issue of generally making sure that one maximizes their opportunity to make QSO's. One way woul
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02052.html (8,053 bytes)

74. [VHFcontesting] Skeds (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:54 2003
Where 'ya been? I seem to remember W2SZ doing this already. :) Geez, I *think* it was them. My memory ain't what it used to be. Ev, W2EV
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02054.html (7,363 bytes)

75. [VHFcontesting] Bragging for my li'l Brother (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:55 2003
Little Jesse (6'4" & 350 lbs) forsook the greenery of Western New York for the sun of Florida. He often lamented the lack of activity on VHF (in comparison to the Great Lakes region). Then, came June
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02104.html (6,831 bytes)

76. [VHFcontesting] Re: [PSK_VHF_UHF_HAMRADIO] K9ZF /R no budget Rover planning for the2003ARRL June VHF QSO Party (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:36 2003
CU2QSO was developed using the IC-V8000! It is an awesome transceiver and well suited for such operation (it is the highest power mobile 2m FM transceiver on the market). I would suggest using a stan
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02171.html (8,502 bytes)

77. [VHFcontesting] Digital modes (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:47 2003
First, I appologize for the lateness of this reply. I've been away on business, but here goes... Here is what the ARRL's own rules say: -- General Rules for all ARRL contests -- 1.Precedence of Rules
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02236.html (8,074 bytes)

78. [VHFcontesting] Digital modes (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:47 2003
Someone is misinterpreting something. There is no difference between BEACONet.25's simplex AX.25-based CU2QSO system (the very one that Dan Henderson approved) and someone using a contest voice keyer
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02237.html (7,578 bytes)

79. [VHFcontesting] A Brief History of (Captive) Roving (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:47 2003
1. There was a time when there was little activity above 1296 MHz. 2. Multi-Ops _Elmered_ rovers into the higher bands for obvious reasons. NOTE: Isn't this EXACTLY what needs to be done to "save the
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02254.html (9,870 bytes)

80. [VHFcontesting] Strange Offsets [was: Rover available for captivity!] (score: 1)
Author: w2ev@arrl.net (Ev Tupis (W2EV))
Date: Thu Jun 19 16:44:47 2003
Frank is exactly correct. 10-GHz IF's of 33 MHz (tellurometers) vs. 100 MHz (BC Band) vs. 10.7 MHz (it was easy) vs. 30 MHz (now standard for WBFM). It wasn't an attempt to keep people from working o
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-06/msg02265.html (9,042 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu