Hey Dex, It would be very cool if you would ask W1XX directly, then post the answer to the list so we will all know together. :) Ev ___________________________________________________________________
I have made a qso of 12 miles on 432 without an antenna. <snip> Now, was that a disqualified qso? -- I've done similar things by accident on 1.2 GHz. I view the antenna as "whatever is doing the radi
Here are two examples of antennas that are not connected to the transmitter by wires: http://www.qsl.net/n1bwt/chap3.pdf http://www.qsl.net/n1bwt/chap8.pdf I think that it is best for W1XX to comment
I propose that 7.188 LSB (+/- QRM) be used as liaison for VHF and microwave work. It is a band that can be used in mobiles (rovers) and enjoys a range that is similar to what can be expected from the
Would Andrew FSJ1-50A Superflex be good to use for 432 on a rover? There's a new 20' patch cable with N-males advertised on fleaBay for $30/delivered. -- According to Andrew Corp's website, FSJ1-50's
A breath of fresh air, John! Thank you for taking the time to address this issue publicly. Also, thanks a TON for the certificate! I'm honored with a #1 All Band New York and saddened that I'll miss
-- Original Message -- I suppose I am at a loss as to why anyone would think the two band format is better for beginners? If 432 MHz were available more contacts could be made by participating statio
Which reminds me...are there any other VHF contests that are touted as international in scope? I can't think of any. Ev, W2EV _________________________________________________________________________
I really feel sorry for the ARRL's VUAC and whatever committee it now reports to at the ARRL. They are faced with a politically no-win situation as everyone chimes in with their input. Asking for inp
Once again: APRS is FINE to use in ARRL Contests. The ARRL has said so, publicly. To do so, one must simply remove the components of APRS that support: (A) digipeating, when "assistance" is prohibite
Note, that I've left the Subject intact, in case there are those who wish to ignore it. :) One of the benefits of on-list discussions is that it affords an opportunity to learn from others. After whi
-- Original Message -- I don't have a problem with it, but without widespread adoption it's not something that's going to the top of my todo list for the Jitney. SDR, reflocking, networking, etc are
-- Original Message -- Having said that, activity begets activity and if ARPS keeps folks in the seat more because they find contesting "easier," I say go for it. The HF'er I was talking to suggested
-- Original Message -- My perspective on this is that APRS can be an aid or crutch to the weak rover station, while not needed by a strong rover station. ........................... Remember, HamIM/A
-- Original Message -- http://www4.qth.com/~isisocom/propnet/HamIM/HamIM.html -- Yup, that's the link for the HamIM strategy. It clearly spells out how to reconfigure your operations to be compliant
I've resisted replying to these statements, but my OCD is kicking in. :) I've retitled the subject so as to help remove unnecessary confusion. -- Original Message -- <Yes, but self spotting (which is
So, you want full-blown APRS in contests? You got it! Just look beyond the ARRL's events! The Fall Sprints are right around the corner, and there is NO prohibition against using APRS. Ev, W2EV ______
The only way to be decoded is to be heard. Maximize your ability to be heard. == The following is for home stations == -- Antenna -- Put a *gain* omni-directional vertical antenna as high as you can
-- Original Message -- So a multi-op can spot me, and put me on a non-RF system, but I can't put myself there. That's my contention. What's the difference in the end-result? -- Here's the problem: th
-- Original Message -- Power is king and antenna is queen? I think the reverse is true, based on my past experiences. -- I'm constantly amazed what can be done, if we just try. :) Thanks for sharing