Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w4wa@alltel.net: 48 ]

Total 48 documents matching your query.

21. [VHFcontesting] W4WA EM84EI on SO HP this weekend. (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Hooper" <w4wa@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2007 18:39:36 -0400
Look for me on 50 through 2304 mhz in the contest. E mail if you would like a sked. I am down to 30 watts on 902/3, lost the final but have about 100 watts or more on all other bands if everything ke
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-09/msg00045.html (7,070 bytes)

22. Re: [VHFcontesting] rules (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Hooper" <w4wa@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 29 Jan 2008 08:47:19 -0500
Hi George Coming from both a HF and VHF contesting background as well, I agree with Marshall. The way I remember it, HF contesters were the primary reason the rule concerning the use of phone calls d
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-01/msg00317.html (12,029 bytes)

23. Re: [VHFcontesting] 6m Dominant (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Hooper" <w4wa@alltel.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 06:56:23 -0400
Steve, I Feel your PAIN but would never remove 6 meter from the contest. I still found time to work 6 meters and 6 other bands during the contest. Some years 6 does not open very well in June and as
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00259.html (11,244 bytes)

24. Re: [VHFcontesting] Ethics (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Hooper" <w4wa@alltel.net>
Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2008 07:16:52 -0400
Dave, I use a computer to log with but never been bitten to use WSJT to make contacts. I still have the choice but elected to not use WSJT (yet). Some of the stations use the Software Defined Radio (
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00261.html (8,901 bytes)

25. Re: [VHFcontesting] 6meter (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Hooper" <w4wa@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 20 Jun 2008 07:28:31 -0400
Hi Gabor I would and have for years like to see distance based scoring for the VHF contest. This keeps coming up and talked about but nothing ever happens. Some of the issues are that contest logging
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00306.html (9,344 bytes)

26. Re: [VHFcontesting] distance scoring (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Hooper" <w4wa@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 07:17:49 -0400
Instead of inventing the wheel again we need to see how the VHF contest are administered in Europe using distance. I am sure a little research to find the right person to act as a consultant would cl
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00345.html (9,661 bytes)

27. Re: [VHFcontesting] 6meter - distance scoring (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Hooper" <w4wa@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 21 Jun 2008 09:16:33 -0400
Hi Duane I agree with you. Leveling the playing field is certainly not the issue and distance scoring may or may not help. I do think it would help get the rovers off the roads and back to using high
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00346.html (15,092 bytes)

28. Re: [VHFcontesting] September Contest (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Hooper" <w4wa@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Aug 2008 06:51:27 -0400
Hi Les I think you will enjoy roving since I know something about the limited setup in antennas that you are using at home. As with any station design, you will first need to set your goal as to what
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-08/msg00115.html (9,583 bytes)

29. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover rules discussion (score: 1)
Author: "Ron Hooper" <w4wa@alltel.net>
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 18:26:50 -0500
Good idea TOM. The rover rules have used up more cyber space than Classmates.com messages. Ron _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-11/msg00104.html (7,821 bytes)

30. Re: [VHFcontesting] distance scoring (score: 1)
Author: Ron Hooper <w4wa@alltel.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:49:10 -0500
Like Jim, I am reluctant to get into this thread. The distance base score conversation seems to pop up about every year, I still have the E-MAILS from the last time it came up. The conversation gets
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00142.html (11,708 bytes)

31. Re: [VHFcontesting] A distance scoring contest (score: 1)
Author: Ron Hooper <w4wa@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Feb 2009 11:09:16 -0500
Hi Kevin Thanks for trying to get this group focused into a direction that could yield some results. I would like to include some basic information. I think a lot of us old timers remember the reluct
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00171.html (12,620 bytes)

32. Re: [VHFcontesting] The Psychology of Contest Participation (score: 1)
Author: Ron Hooper <w4wa@alltel.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 2009 22:53:06 -0500
People enter radio contest for many different reasons. Sometimes 100's of thousands of dollars and super operators in the middle of the US will not win over a modest station in the NE. Obviously, the
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00211.html (11,253 bytes)

33. Re: [VHFcontesting] psyched out (score: 1)
Author: Ron Hooper <w4wa@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:24:31 -0500
Hi Paul Can you help me to understand why you think the work load would increase on the sponsors for distance scoring? I didn't think we are actually talking about a new set of rules only the way the
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00213.html (12,961 bytes)

34. Re: [VHFcontesting] psyched out (score: 1)
Author: Ron Hooper <w4wa@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 08:26:07 -0500
Hi Paul Thanks for the follow up. I agree that passing the 6 digit grid during the exchange might not be attractive to many operators including myself on some bands. On 902 mhz and up to 2.3 ghz I ru
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00219.html (18,215 bytes)

35. Re: [VHFcontesting] frisbee roving (score: 1)
Author: Ron Hooper <w4wa@alltel.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:04:42 -0500
Hang in there Frank. Operating with an intent to do something doesn't mean the goal is always achieved. You might tell your mother in law to stop smoking in the house and she keeps doing it. What wil
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00220.html (7,923 bytes)

36. Re: [VHFcontesting] Interpetation of VHF rule 2.3.3 (score: 1)
Author: Ron Hooper <w4wa@alltel.net>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:51:30 -0500
I have always had the vision to operate a VHF contest from the earth's moon. The only direction of the antenna would be toward the earth so it is like EME in reverse tracking. Stations on earth might
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00311.html (10,820 bytes)

37. Re: [VHFcontesting] Contesting Philosophy (score: 1)
Author: Ron Hooper <w4wa@alltel.net>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:02:44 -0500
Hello Gents I got a question, can someone tell me why the CQ Contest rules never seem to come up for discussion on this list? Marshall, your e-mail was in my spam bucket for some reason. I just recei
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00349.html (10,585 bytes)

38. Re: [VHFcontesting] Contesting Philosophy (score: 1)
Author: Ron Hooper <w4wa@alltel.net>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:18:33 -0500
contests were in years past is off. I always thought, perhaps >naively, that skeds weren't commonly used, or simply were not used for many of the Q's that ops made. So why now? Yes? No? Duane I don'
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00364.html (11,972 bytes)

39. Re: [VHFcontesting] Contesting Philosophy (score: 1)
Author: Ron Hooper <w4wa@alltel.net>
Date: Sun, 1 Mar 2009 18:20:22 -0500
Hi Dustin Thanks for asking the question and good to have you in here. I will try to explain what schedules mean to me. Not during a contest period: If your trying to work a new grid, possibly a rove
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-03/msg00003.html (11,323 bytes)

40. [VHFcontesting] Questions on making a valid contest QSO. (score: 1)
Author: Ron Hooper <w4wa@alltel.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Mar 2009 16:42:03 -0400
Just a short answer will be fine, not to take up much bandwidth here. I am curious how many operators actually give both call signs in a contest QSO 100% of the time? Do you think giving both calls i
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-03/msg00034.html (7,051 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu