- 1. Re: [VHFcontesting] CQ WW VHF Log Submission Issues (score: 1)
- Author: Tim Lee <w5trl.tim@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2023 19:37:10 -0500
- Submission website had a problem with the dates in my Cabrillo file... This was about 20mins after the contest ended. Said the Dates/Timse in the log were outside the Dates/times of of the contest. J
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2023-07/msg00020.html (8,435 bytes)
- 2. Re: [VHFcontesting] PSE try FT4 on 6m (score: 1)
- Author: Tim Lee <w5trl.tim@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 10:47:22 -0500
- Agreed wholeheartedly! 6m is so up and down this contest (lots of broken Qs due to rapid QSB) that FT4 has a MUCH better chance of getting the sequences done, quicker. Out of the few that are running
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2024-06/msg00018.html (7,973 bytes)
- 3. Re: [VHFcontesting] PSE try FT4 on 6m (score: 1)
- Author: Tim Lee <w5trl.tim@gmail.com>
- Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 11:32:24 -0500
- George - I agree that one of the downsides to the digital modes is how it's affected the QSO rate on SSB.... In the 80s I could keep pace with the best of operators on voice modes..... However, it's
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2024-06/msg00021.html (12,245 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu