Mail Archive Search: <+from:w5trl.tim@gmail.com>

Results:

References: [ +from:w5trl.tim@gmail.com: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] CQ WW VHF Log Submission Issues (score: 1): Author: Tim Lee <w5trl.tim@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 16 Jul 2023 19:37:10 -0500; Submission website had a problem with the dates in my Cabrillo file... This was about 20mins after the contest ended. Said the Dates/Timse in the log were outside the Dates/times of of the contest. J; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2023-07/msg00020.html (8,435 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] PSE try FT4 on 6m (score: 1): Author: Tim Lee <w5trl.tim@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 10:47:22 -0500; Agreed wholeheartedly! 6m is so up and down this contest (lots of broken Qs due to rapid QSB) that FT4 has a MUCH better chance of getting the sequences done, quicker. Out of the few that are running; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2024-06/msg00018.html (7,973 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] PSE try FT4 on 6m (score: 1): Author: Tim Lee <w5trl.tim@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 9 Jun 2024 11:32:24 -0500; George - I agree that one of the downsides to the digital modes is how it's affected the QSO rate on SSB.... In the 80s I could keep pace with the best of operators on voice modes..... However, it's; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2024-06/msg00021.html (12,245 bytes)
4. [VHFcontesting] Suggesting use of FT4 if/when 6m has deep QSB (score: 1): Author: Tim Lee <w5trl.tim@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2025 09:08:01 -0600; Contestants When/if you start experiencing a lot of broken Qs due to the infamous one sequence and theyre gone QSB, Ive had a lot of luck switching from FT8 over to FT4. During one particularly bad d; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2025-01/msg00042.html (7,791 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]