- 1. [VHFcontesting] CQ WW VHF Contest Rules Changes (score: 1)
- Author: Lew Sayre <w7ew@arrl.net>
- Date: Thu, 21 Apr 2011 22:57:13 -0700
- Yo, Wow. What a bunch of simply wonderful changes for the VHF radio contest! Now there is not really much difference between a multi-op and a single op. No need to emphasize the ancient skill of tuni
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2011-04/msg00060.html (8,404 bytes)
- 2. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] N4JQQ June Claimed Score (score: 1)
- Author: Lew Sayre <w7ew@arrl.net>
- Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 23:56:41 -0700
- HI Folks, A Single-Op station using 2 ears is not the same as a Single-Op station using hundreds of ears. Neither Single-Op station is better than the other. You use whichever system that makes the r
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2011-06/msg00098.html (10,313 bytes)
- 3. [VHFcontesting] Digital and Q arrangement contesting (score: 1)
- Author: Lew Sayre <w7ew@arrl.net>
- Date: Mon, 23 Sep 2019 20:40:41 -0700
- Greetings to all Contesters, K5QE has written up a fine article about VHF contesting and why we should leave the contest rules alone. It is clear that K5QE cares deeply about the subject. So do I. I
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-09/msg00101.html (10,742 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu