Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:w9sz@prairienet.org: 361 ]

Total 361 documents matching your query.

181. Re: [VHFcontesting] WAHOO - LoTW Double Whammy(and a half) (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Tue, 18 Jul 2006 09:30:41 -0500 (CDT)
For those who understand, no explanation is necessary. For those who don't, no explanation is possible. ;-) 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VH
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-07/msg00103.html (7,967 bytes)

182. Re: [VHFcontesting] BD for Windows XP? (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Mon, 7 Aug 2006 23:25:44 -0500 (CDT)
WinGrid does. Do a search for it with Google and you'll find it. 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.con
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-08/msg00027.html (7,127 bytes)

183. [VHFcontesting] W9SZ ARRL UHF 2006 (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Tue, 8 Aug 2006 09:57:43 -0500 (CDT)
ARRL UHF Contest Call: W9SZ Class: Single Op LP QTH: EN50rl hill near Gibson City, IL Operating Time (hrs): 8 Summary: Band QSOs Points Mults -- 222: 13 39 9 432: 18 54 10 903: 3 18 3 1.2: 6 36 6 2.3
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-08/msg00029.html (8,014 bytes)

184. Re: [VHFcontesting] question about portable operator class (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Aug 2006 07:18:59 -0500 (CDT)
Hi David, You can do either of the scenarios you mentioned as a portable op. I've been operating QRP Portable in VHF contests for quite a few years now. In my case, I stuff equipment for 10 bands int
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-08/msg00043.html (8,769 bytes)

185. Re: [VHFcontesting] QRP vs portable (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 09:22:20 -0500 (CDT)
Yes, you can do whatever you want. There are no separate categories for QRP at home in ARRL contests, however. You'll be up against the "low-power" class if you operate from home. So if you're just o
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-08/msg00060.html (7,886 bytes)

186. [VHFcontesting] CQWW VHF log (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Aug 2006 22:51:03 -0500 (CDT)
Hi, I finally got around to sending my Cabrillo log to cqvhf@cqww-vhf.com yesterday. It just bounced back to me. Also, I cannot get into http://www.cqww-vhf.com. Does anyone know what's up? 73, Zack
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-08/msg00061.html (6,492 bytes)

187. Re: [VHFcontesting] N9UHF September VHF Contest plans (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Thu, 7 Sep 2006 00:09:18 -0500 (CDT)
I now have 2 watts on 10 GHz (as well as on 2304 thru 5760 and 10 watts on all the lower bands). I'll be looking for you from EN50rl. 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ VHF
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-09/msg00022.html (7,545 bytes)

188. Re: [VHFcontesting] THE MAN (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2006 08:56:07 -0500 (CDT)
Well, I hope I don't run into anything similar this weekend. Last weekend I was on private property and have full permission from the owner to be there. He stopped by once in a while to see how I was
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-09/msg00056.html (7,940 bytes)

189. Re: [VHFcontesting] SVHFS 222 Fall Sprint Results and Observationsde W4SHG/R (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 08:50:27 -0500 (CDT)
I hate when that happens! I was prepared for that scenario in the 10 GHz contest, since I was going to be 360 miles from home. I took along every spare part I could think of, plus soldering iron and
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-09/msg00098.html (8,118 bytes)

190. Re: [VHFcontesting] KC9BQA 21 Q's and 11 grids from EN63 (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 09:28:10 -0500 (CDT)
Darn it ... weekday nights are generally out for me for any sort of contesting activity (unless they go past 11 pm or so). I'd have liked to participate in this one but ... Hopefully I can participat
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-10/msg00021.html (7,527 bytes)

191. Re: [VHFcontesting] [Roving...] (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2006 10:46:07 -0600 (CST)
Assuming he was a Rover in a new grid square, I don't see a difference as long as he wasn't using both callsigns from the same VE7 grid square. But using the US call portable VE7 would've been more c
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-11/msg00075.html (8,069 bytes)

192. Re: [VHFcontesting] June with VHF LCR (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 22:53:49 -0600 (CST)
I think I did quite well. Only two dupes (which I already knew about) and two NIL's. I hope the January contest brings decent weather (if that's possible in January) and a lot of activity. 73, Zack W
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-12/msg00052.html (7,271 bytes)

193. Re: [VHFcontesting] [sidewindersontwo] Digest Number 1498 (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2007 11:31:47 -0600 (CST)
I don't know. We've been spared this time in my area and I just hope it stays cold enough to freeze the ground. I plan on running Single-Op Portable (QRP) from a hill in EN50rl. I was up there for th
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-01/msg00040.html (8,623 bytes)

194. [VHFcontesting] ARRL Jan VHF W9SZ Single Op Port QRP (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2007 23:47:27 -0600 (CST)
ARRL January VHF Sweepstakes Call: W9SZ Operator(s): W9SZ Station: W9SZ Class: Single Op Port QRP QTH: EN50rl hilltop ~980 ft. asl Operating Time (hrs): 9 Summary: Band QSOs Mults -- 6: 0 0 2: 25 13
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-01/msg00060.html (9,017 bytes)

195. Re: [VHFcontesting] Shortest time to 2m VUCC (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 14:14:03 -0600 (CST)
Having done Single-Op Portable QRP in most VHF contests for the past 10 years or so, I can vouch for that. When the other station can't hear me on SSB, I switch to CW and usually can complete the QSO
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-02/msg00063.html (9,767 bytes)

196. Re: [VHFcontesting] vhf/uhf activity (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Mon, 26 Feb 2007 23:11:11 -0600 (CST)
I wonder how many Techs are active on VHF+ weak-signal modes? Most of the people I work have General or Extra licenses. I am active on all HF bands as well as VHF+. And I have a lowfer antenna in the
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-02/msg00081.html (9,286 bytes)

197. Re: [VHFcontesting] vhf/uhf activity (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 08:14:29 -0600 (CST)
Maybe it varies from area to area. In this area there are very few Techs, if any, on the weak signal modes on VHF+. I don't know of any who are active on 2304 and above. As Jim said, I'm not saying t
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-02/msg00086.html (12,980 bytes)

198. Re: [VHFcontesting] Subject: Re: vhf/uhf activity (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:52:24 -0600 (CST)
I agree with both postings. It takes a certain type of person to build and/or assemble equipment for bands that are not covered by "out-of-the-box" transceivers (or even to build your own 6m-on-up ge
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-02/msg00106.html (11,734 bytes)

199. Re: [VHFcontesting] Subject: Re: vhf/uhf activity (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 16:54:45 -0600 (CST)
Yeah, I'm two away from Honor Roll for DXCC. They get pretty scarce up in that range! 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-02/msg00107.html (8,227 bytes)

200. Re: [VHFcontesting] VHF/UHF Activity (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Feb 2007 23:44:52 -0600 (CST)
Loops aren't going to get you a lot of long-haul work but they do have their advantages. As you say, they're certainly better than no antenna at all. If you have a large Yagi you are only going to he
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-02/msg00112.html (9,783 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu