Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +from:wv2zow@gmail.com: 32 ]

Total 32 documents matching your query.

21. Re: [VHFcontesting] PL 259 crimp connectors for RG 400 (score: 1)
Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 8 Jun 2016 17:17:49 -0400
Just to make sure we are all speaking of the same cable, RG-400/u is a Teflon 0.195" diam (RG-58 class) cable with two shields and a stranded center while LMR400 is a 0.405" diam (RG-8 class) cable w
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-06/msg00046.html (18,220 bytes)

22. Re: [VHFcontesting] Rover Definition In ARRL Sept VHF Contest? (score: 1)
Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Sep 2016 22:30:02 -0400
Pete: Zack's advice is good, but if you worked the same station from both locations, you may only count it once. --Mike, WV2ZOW _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing l
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2016-09/msg00057.html (8,578 bytes)

23. Re: [VHFcontesting] modes question, what do we log C4FM or DSTAR as? (score: 1)
Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Feb 2017 11:44:14 -0500
Interesting. Some of the digital voice modes have a data sub channel, so if one passes the exchange via microphone and speaker, its phone, but, at the same time, the exchange can be passed on the dat
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-02/msg00051.html (13,964 bytes)

24. Re: [VHFcontesting] North-West FN41 VHF Rover Sites (score: 1)
Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jul 2017 17:03:26 -0400
Sean: I used to manage a a former microwave antenna site owned by SNET in Brooklyn CT (near intersection of US 6 and I 395) Nice site, good shot SW. It is private property, now managed by AT&T. I sus
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-07/msg00001.html (9,205 bytes)

25. Re: [VHFcontesting] Digital Questions (score: 1)
Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Sep 2017 09:57:32 -0400
VHF and up contests differ from almost all other contests in that there is only goal -- make the contact. Can't get through on SSB? Switch to CW. Mixed mode contact -- allowed. Should that point valu
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-09/msg00133.html (13,846 bytes)

26. Re: [VHFcontesting] 6 and 2 meters (score: 1)
Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Dec 2017 16:25:11 -0500
Not familiar with the Johnson, but the Henry was quite an interesting amp. It had separate inputs and outputs for 6 and 2, so there was no switching. One could also tune it for both bands so band swi
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-12/msg00013.html (8,771 bytes)

27. Re: [VHFcontesting] Portable 50 MHz beam antennas (score: 1)
Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 13:16:39 -0500
While discussing portable 6 meter antennas, does anyone recall the 2 element Telrex (at least I think it was a Telrex). It was a conical style, like a TV antenna, and all the elements were split. Whe
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-02/msg00069.html (29,581 bytes)

28. Re: [VHFcontesting] K1SIG/R preliminary results (score: 1)
Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2018 19:31:41 -0400
I've used these as well. Since they are a high pass and low pass filter in one box, the load on the unused port isn't really necessary. They work great to isolate bands. Very low loss. --Mike, WV2ZOW
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-09/msg00059.html (8,395 bytes)

29. Re: [VHFcontesting] 144 Sprint WZ1V (score: 1)
Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 10:46:48 -0400
Ron: Couldn't you have used a narrow filter to filter out the strong station? Sure-- you would miss some of the passband, but you could move around with each call. Also, I didn't think the east/west
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-09/msg00077.html (8,511 bytes)

30. Re: [VHFcontesting] 422-449 MHz UHF being jammed by Fallon NAS/FTTR. (score: 1)
Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Apr 2019 11:59:24 -0400
Jay: We are only secondary to authorized primary users. A story: Back in the late 1970s, our group operated a 440 repeater in Northern New Jersey. One day, this really raucous buzz that varied in str
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-04/msg00054.html (13,071 bytes)

31. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT4 Mode (score: 1)
Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 14:19:43 -0400
Jay: The argument that SSB is so much faster than FT8/4 and stations should switch to SSB when the band is open is not universally true. It is if you are the station running guys on a specific freque
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-05/msg00008.html (16,512 bytes)

32. Re: [VHFcontesting] 50 MHz Sprint results (score: 1)
Author: Michael Clarson <wv2zow@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2019 15:35:40 -0400
While Ft-8 is slower than ssb, there was plenty of time to work everyone. _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesti
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-05/msg00051.html (8,847 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu