Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+\[VHF\]\s+N4JQQ\s+June\s+Claimed\s+Score\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+\[VHF\]\s+N4JQQ\s+June\s+Claimed\s+Score\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] N4JQQ June Claimed Score (score: 1): Author: Marshall Williams <k5qe@sabinenet.com>; Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 15:52:29 +0100; Hello everyone....Here is a classic example of the way the current ARRL rules discriminate against Single-Op stations. Steve has a nice score for a Single-Op station. He was forced to enter as a faux; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2011-06/msg00095.html (8,980 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] N4JQQ June Claimed Score (score: 1): Author: Lew Sayre <w7ew@arrl.net>; Date: Sat, 18 Jun 2011 23:56:41 -0700; HI Folks, A Single-Op station using 2 ears is not the same as a Single-Op station using hundreds of ears. Neither Single-Op station is better than the other. You use whichever system that makes the r; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2011-06/msg00098.html (10,313 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] N4JQQ June Claimed Score (score: 1): Author: "thomas antil" <thantil@comcast.net>; Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 08:06:56 -0400; It is easier then that. The rules are laid out for a reason and are specific. If you can not follow the rules then do not participate. PS get off my bumper because I am not going to go faster then th; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2011-06/msg00099.html (9,989 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] N4JQQ June Claimed Score (score: 1): Author: George Fremin III <geoiii@kkn.net>; Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2011 07:29:25 -0700; They did not. The ARRL and CQ DX contests have both assisted and non-assisted categories for single ops in their contests with the exception of the CQ WPX RTTY contest and the CQ VHF contest. I think; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2011-06/msg00103.html (8,542 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]