Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+\[VHF\]\s+Re\:\s+\[nfarl\]\s+2\s+Meter\s+AM\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+\[VHF\]\s+Re\:\s+\[nfarl\]\s+2\s+Meter\s+AM\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Re: [nfarl] 2 Meter AM (score: 1): Author: Keith Morehouse <w9rm@yahoo.com>; Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 12:34:57 -0800 (PST); In EN52 this summer and early Autumn, I noticed quite a bit of AM activity. I think it was a organized group, somewhere down to the SE. UNFORTUNATELY, they decided to do it on 144.140 - the WSJT M/S; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-01/msg00089.html (21,410 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Re: [nfarl] 2 Meter AM (score: 1): Author: Tad Danley <tdanley@suddenlink.net>; Date: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 19:43:29 -0600; In 1973, my Ameco TX-62 and I were on 145.08 and 50.4 AM. There was always a group of folks to work on 2 meters in the evening for a good part of the 1970s. Most of the six meter guys like W3BWU and; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-01/msg00091.html (9,344 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Re: [nfarl] 2 Meter AM (score: 1): Author: Tom Frenaye <frenaye@hughes.net>; Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 00:06:34 -0500; Bill - I'm pretty sure ARRL never adopted a national band plan. The one you quoted has been printed in ARRL publications for 20+ years, but usually includes the comment that it is a "general recommen; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-01/msg00094.html (10,996 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]