Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+\[VHF\]\s+Some\s+432MHz\s+Questions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+\[VHF\]\s+Some\s+432MHz\s+Questions\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Some 432MHz Questions (score: 1): Author: James Duffey <JamesDuffey@comcast.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 16:09:19 -0600; A stack of Big Wheels would do well. Two will be a great improvement over a single eggbeater, and four will be even better. Stack them at 0.75 spacing. You probably want to space them a wavelength or; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00432.html (10,213 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Some 432MHz Questions (score: 1): Author: "David" <ke4yyd@gtcom.net>; Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 22:48:52 -0400; There are no radials under the Eggbeater. I will not be able to stack antennas so my question deals with the efficiency of a single Eggbeater as compared to other single antennas such as HO-Loop, Par; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00435.html (10,859 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Some 432MHz Questions (score: 1): Author: aa4zz@aol.com; Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 23:16:27 -0400; David I'm not sure that a stack of loops at 17"? on 432 takes up?a whole lot more space than an egg beater is space is your limiting factor. The Par loops are more easily side mounted on a tower than; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00437.html (11,636 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]