Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+\[VHF\]\s+Use\s+It\s+or\s+Lose\s+It\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+\[VHF\]\s+Use\s+It\s+or\s+Lose\s+It\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Use It or Lose It (score: 1): Author: "Les Rayburn" <les@highnoonfilm.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 12:55:15 -0600; It seems clear that another assault on our frequencies is coming. I'd be willing to bet my next paycheck that the ARRL will cease this opportunity to drum up contributions to the Spectrum Defense Fun; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-12/msg00079.html (8,956 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Use It or Lose It (score: 1): Author: "Les Rayburn" <les@highnoonfilm.com>; Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:10:41 -0600; Steve, I wondered how long it would take for someone to bring up Chamberlin. Good Lord... Corporate giants are hardly Nazi's--and your facts are simply in error. It is possible to craft legislation t; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-12/msg00080.html (19,849 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Use It or Lose It (score: 1): Author: "James Hayes" <n2yev94@charter.net>; Date: Thu, 31 Dec 2009 00:45:48 -0500; I Think Les Has a good idea going here, but I also think if we give the 'mob' any bit of the spectrum they will continually fight harder for even more of our precious frequency allocation. Another ap; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-12/msg00082.html (11,323 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] [VHF] Use It or Lose It (score: 1): Author: "Doug Rehman" <doug@k4ac.com>; Date: Mon, 4 Jan 2010 12:44:07 -0500; Before anyone starts trying to negotiate with corporations, take a look at the actual uhf/microwave amateur allocations. We are secondary users on many of these frequencies. It appears that the gover; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-01/msg00022.html (7,964 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]