Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+5BVUCC\s+Nets\s+Support\s+of\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+5BVUCC\s+Nets\s+Support\s+of\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] 5BVUCC Nets Support of (score: 1): Author: Les Rayburn <les@highnoonfilm.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 12:40:32 -0500; Just heard back from Mike Ritz, W7VO who is the Director of the Northwestern Division. Hes fully supportive of the proposal to create the new award. Reach out to your ARRL Director today, and lets se; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-04/msg00067.html (7,298 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] 5BVUCC Nets Support of (score: 1): Author: K7XC Tim Marek <k7xcnv1@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 17:58:39 +0000; Adding Satellite QSOs to a Terrestrial Award is something I Can NOT Endorse. They are separate from Terrestrial VUCC awards for a reason. Create a 5B VUCC award by all means all the reasons stated, j; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-04/msg00071.html (8,139 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] 5BVUCC Nets Support of (score: 1): Author: John Geiger <af5cc2@gmail.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 13:56:59 -0500; What about EME QSOs? Those are not terrestrial. 73 John AF5CC _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailm; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-04/msg00074.html (9,631 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] 5BVUCC Nets Support of (score: 1): Author: Mark W7MEM McMillan <w7mem@msn.com>; Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2019 19:14:55 +0000; Eme is of natural processes. I E E skip. With out EME NO award could be possible! Sent from my iPhone ! _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contes; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-04/msg00076.html (10,522 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]