Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+70\s+cm\s+power\s+restrictions\/Pave\s+Paws\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+70\s+cm\s+power\s+restrictions\/Pave\s+Paws\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] 70 cm power restrictions/Pave Paws (score: 1): Author: "Jon Casamajor" <k6el@comcast.net>; Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 14:31:26 -0800; On 26 Jan KK6MC said>>> I could have sworn that last time I checked this it said 50 Watts RMS, but that is pretty much irrelevant for most of our operations. This document is revised in March, Octobe; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-01/msg00189.html (8,310 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] 70 cm power restrictions/Pave Paws (score: 1): Author: R Johnson <k1vu@tmlp.com>; Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 21:00:32 -0500; Hi Jon: A few things come to mind: -EME CW has a very low duty cycle, FM approaches 100% -EME Beam width is Narrow (we hope, with no side lobes), FM strives for Omni-directional. -EME CW & PSK31 are; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-01/msg00207.html (10,181 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]