Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+756\s+PRO\s+III\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+756\s+PRO\s+III\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] 756 PRO III (score: 1): Author: "Gregg Seidl" <k9kl@centurytel.net>; Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 09:07:27 -0500; I used a 756 PRO II until I got my 7800 then I used the 7800 on 6 with the II as a backup until I got my 7700.The 756 is a fine rig,the scope is GREAT at helping you see an opening.You won't be disap; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00029.html (6,835 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] 756 PRO III (score: 1): Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 5 Jun 2008 09:05:54 -0700 (PDT); For many of us the 7700 and 7800 are not options. But, even if they were, it would be a real decision for me to spend that much more money when my ProIII clearly works very well for me. My only compl; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2008-06/msg00030.html (7,786 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]