Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+902\s+vs\.\s+903\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+902\s+vs\.\s+903\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] 902 vs. 903 (score: 1): Author: "Michael E Fox $N6MEF$" <n6mef@mefox.org>; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:05:33 -0800; This question has probably been answered before but I can't seem to find the answer. 33cm transverters seem to be either 902 or 903MHz, not both. So I guess I need to pick one. On the West coast (Nor; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00119.html (7,391 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] 902 vs. 903 (score: 1): Author: Bruce Kripton <bkripton@pacbell.net>; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 11:21:24 -0800 (PST); Just the way things are done I guess .... Generally, East of the Mississippi, 903, West of the Mississippi 902 .... most transverters will work the 1 meg spread providing the IF Radio can handle it; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00120.html (8,425 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] 902 vs. 903 (score: 1): Author: "Rogers, Ron" <RR124640@ncr.com>; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:03:40 -0500; Do we need a rules change to force contest operations to one frequency segment or the other. Has someone found a scoring advantage by using one band segment rather the other. :) Ron WW8RR --Original; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00122.html (8,477 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] 902 vs. 903 (score: 1): Author: aa4zz@aol.com; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:30:47 -0500; Contesters should have the chioce to run whever they need to go to make contacts. 73 Paul AA4ZZ Do we need a rules change to force contest operations to one frequency segment or the other. Has someon; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00125.html (9,235 bytes)
5. Re: [VHFcontesting] 902 vs. 903 (score: 1): Author: "Michael E Fox $N6MEF$" <n6mef@mefox.org>; Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2009 13:54:59 -0800; Thanks for all of the responses for 902 vs. 903 MHz. I didn't realize I could have one unit that did both. That works for me! Michael - N6MEF _______________________________________________ VHFcontes; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00126.html (7,461 bytes)
6. Re: [VHFcontesting] 902 vs. 903 (score: 1): Author: "Jim Worsham" <wa4kxy@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 00:24:30 -0500; I have heard that in some areas the noise is less on 902 but don't let that get out or we will be hearing about the need to change the rules because of that "unfair advantage". 73 Jim, W4KXY Do we ne; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00131.html (9,769 bytes)
7. Re: [VHFcontesting] 902 vs. 903 (score: 1): Author: kb7dqh@donobi.net; Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2009 03:30:54 -0800 (PST); Generally, "33cm" QSO's fall into the "pre-arranged" category, much like the higher microwave bands. Best success on this band is where a liaison is employed so as to determine a "mutually quiet" fre; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-02/msg00133.html (11,350 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]