Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+A\s+suggestion\s+for\s+ERP\-based\s+Entry\s+Classes\[was\:Stupid\s+Categories\s+\.\.\.\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+A\s+suggestion\s+for\s+ERP\-based\s+Entry\s+Classes\[was\:Stupid\s+Categories\s+\.\.\.\]\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for ERP-based Entry Classes[was:Stupid Categories ...] (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kharker@cs.utexas.edu>; Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2003 10:02:09 -0600; This formula is FAR more complicated than using an RF output threshold for categories. Nobody is going to adopt this. And why would you want people to limit (of all things) their antennas? Putting up; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00044.html (10,362 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]