Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+A\s+suggestion\s+for\s+Limiting\s+MultiOps\s+\[was\:\s+A\s+su\s+ggestion\s+for\s+ERP\-based\s+Entry\s+Classes\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+A\s+suggestion\s+for\s+Limiting\s+MultiOps\s+\[was\:\s+A\s+su\s+ggestion\s+for\s+ERP\-based\s+Entry\s+Classes\]\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for Limiting MultiOps [was: A su ggestion for ERP-based Entry Classes] (score: 1): Author: Ed Kucharski <k3dne@adelphia.net>; Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:34:50 -0500; Well said Mark! I couldn't agree with you more. I'm taking a break from assembling my new 112 element 3456MHz "blowtorch" looper (a new band for me) which is going to be placed on my new tower that i; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00091.html (15,089 bytes)
2. RE: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for Limiting MultiOps [was: A su ggestion for ERP-based Entry Classes] (score: 1): Author: "Hoffman, Mark" <mhoffman@microwavedata.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 11:48:17 -0500; George, Thanks for levelling me out! You are 100% correct - MANY times these categories have been won from regions other than the Northeast. And VERY capable stations outside of the "golden corridor"; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00093.html (10,910 bytes)
3. RE: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for Limiting MultiOps [was: A su ggestion for ERP-based Entry Classes] (score: 1): Author: "Hoffman, Mark" <mhoffman@microwavedata.com>; Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2003 15:14:38 -0500; RIGHT ON! Ken, this is EXACTLY the problem with getting more action on the microwaves! It's expensive (or can be, at least), time consuming and sometimes frustrating like no tomorrow! The BEST suppor; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00096.html (15,992 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]