Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+A\s+suggestion\s+for\s+LimitingMultiOps\[was\:Asuggestionfor\s+ERP\-based\s+Entry\s+Classes\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+A\s+suggestion\s+for\s+LimitingMultiOps\[was\:Asuggestionfor\s+ERP\-based\s+Entry\s+Classes\]\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for LimitingMultiOps[was:Asuggestionfor ERP-based Entry Classes] (score: 1): Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kharker@cs.utexas.edu>; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 07:59:50 -0600; That is the crux of the debate. Allow me to summarize: Ev's position: We should occupy spectrum through radiosport for the sake of occupying spectrum. My position: We should occupy spectrum through r; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00129.html (11,606 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for LimitingMultiOps[was:Asuggestionfor ERP-based Entry Classes] (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:45:05 -0600 (CST); I consider both positions to enter in and to be relevant. We are in danger of losing a lot of frequencies because vested interests are throwing money around in hopes of making even more money on "the; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00134.html (13,473 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] A suggestion for LimitingMultiOps[was:Asuggestionfor ERP-based Entry Classes] (score: 1): Author: Scott Pederson <spederson@yahoo.com>; Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 09:41:48 -0800 (PST); Not necessarily. Even if I do not own equipment for one of these bands, I would fight like hell to keep them, because it wouldn't be right for others to lose out on their bands, their investments, a; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2003-12/msg00140.html (10,797 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]