- 1. [VHFcontesting] APRS Comment (score: 1)
- Author: Dave Agsten <w4txs@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 15:32:17 -0800 (PST)
- Right On Ron, Also, it would nice if the ARRL & CQ opened their eyes and allowed APRS to be used in the VHF/UHF contests. Many, many times while roving I hear stations that don't have their beams poi
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-03/msg00024.html (7,645 bytes)
- 2. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS Comment (score: 1)
- Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
- Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 19:16:27 -0600
- you cannot use regular aprs on 144.390.. because it uses repeaters.. (digipeaters) and internet relays.. I don't see how it would be considered illegal to use regular simplex packet using the same so
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-03/msg00026.html (9,521 bytes)
- 3. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS Comment (score: 1)
- Author: "Rogers, Ron" <RR124640@ncr.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 20:19:41 -0500
- Ray, I don't think he is referring to using APRS for actually making a contest contact. I think he is referring to using APRS to simply report real-time positioning and locations of the rover so you
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-03/msg00027.html (10,334 bytes)
- 4. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS Comment (score: 1)
- Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 17:43:15 -0800 (PST)
- Wouldn't that then put you in the situation of spotting yourself, similar to posting yourself on the internet cluster. If you did that, it would move you to the multiop category. http://lists.contest
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-03/msg00030.html (11,921 bytes)
- 5. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS Comment (score: 1)
- Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
- Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 19:43:31 -0600
- yeah, but you are using the internet and repeaters to solicit contacts.... kinda... W9RAY Ray J _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-03/msg00031.html (11,067 bytes)
- 6. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS Comment (score: 1)
- Author: "Rogers, Ron" <RR124640@ncr.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 21:11:01 -0500
- So guys, Does that also say that everyone must cease the common practice of notifying everyone on this reflector prior to a contest via e-mail your intended grid route, actual intended locations, and
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-03/msg00032.html (13,614 bytes)
- 7. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS Comment (score: 1)
- Author: Ray J <ray@w9ray.org>
- Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 20:47:29 -0600
- i would not think so.. according to the arrl ** Self-spotting is the practice of announcing your own call and run frequency on the spotting network... which is illegal according to general rules the
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-03/msg00034.html (14,066 bytes)
- 8. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS Comment (score: 1)
- Author: "John D'Ausilio" <jdausilio@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 22:00:41 -0500
- For that matter, does it mean that advertising your presence by making qsos during the contest is self-spotting? A simplex APRS exchange is no different than any other simplex FM contact. de w1rt/r j
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-03/msg00035.html (8,563 bytes)
- 9. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS Comment (score: 1)
- Author: John Geiger <johngeig@yahoo.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 19:27:23 -0800 (PST)
- That is true, a simplex APRS contact should be valid. But if you use APRS in such a way that you know you are going to appear on the internet APRS map, then it starts to run into problems with the ru
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-03/msg00036.html (9,295 bytes)
- 10. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS Comment (score: 1)
- Author: "John D'Ausilio" <jdausilio@gmail.com>
- Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 22:34:37 -0500
- The assumption would be that we're all on some frequency other than .39, and the intention is only to alert stations in range of our existence. One of the most frustrating things about roving is tryi
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-03/msg00038.html (10,168 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu