Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+APRS\s+Comment\s+\-\s+The\s+Flaw\s+re\:\s+Rovers\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+APRS\s+Comment\s+\-\s+The\s+Flaw\s+re\:\s+Rovers\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS Comment - The Flaw re: Rovers (score: 1): Author: Duane - N9DG <n9dg@yahoo.com>; Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 18:26:19 -0800 (PST); APRS being run by rovers does you little good when they are out of "FM with an omni" antenna range. In my case for the January VHF SS that would have been 90% of the rover Q's that I did make. So if; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-03/msg00033.html (9,950 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS Comment - The Flaw re: Rovers (score: 1): Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 03:01:19 -0800 (PST); -- Original Message -- APRS being run by rovers does you little good when they are out of "FM with an omni" antenna range. -- The same can be said for any strategy. For instance, "CW does little good; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-03/msg00041.html (7,686 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] APRS Comment - The Flaw re: Rovers (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>; Date: Fri, 2 Mar 2007 08:34:43 -0600 (CST); For Rovers running simplex, it's going to be tough. I suppose it depends on what the Rover is using for the APRS. Assuming he is using about 100 watts and a higher-gain beam for his weak-signal work; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-03/msg00043.html (8,972 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]