All, You are receiving this email via the VHF Contesting Reflector (or PVRC Reflector), or because you received and perhaps commented on my VHF Contest proposal / discussion document of 18 months ago
Author: jimk8mr--- via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 18:53:44 +0000 (UTC)
I will file comments with the CAC, but my suggestion is a variation of #3: two contacts per band (analog & digital) but also having two multipliers per grid square per band, i.e. one for analog and o
So, being a dumb American and knowing nothing about the IARU R1 contests, can I infer they have seperated out MGM (machine genertaed modes) and CW/SSB as seperate contests ? Unfortunately, I think if
I also have a problem with separate CW and voice QSO's per band. I am usually a QRP Portable in ARRL VHF contests. I can very often get through on CW but NOT on SSB. That essentially gives me one mod
Personally I like the idea of three points for analog, one for digital, and the region one use of six digit grids and a distance multiplier myself. Dave N2OA _________________________________________
Zack, I also have a problem with separate CW and voice QSO's per band. Proposed separate ONLY on 6m and 2m. Single mixed/analog on other bands. That essentially gives me one mode to work with most of
Author: Jonesy W3DHJ via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Sep 2021 16:55:26 -0600 (MDT)
I can envision 3 concurrent ARRL VHF contests -- for each of June, September, and January. Legacy mode: Spark, CW, AM, FM, and SSB with all the current rules. Computer mode: FT-whatever -- with all t
If I use a computer to send all CW messages and all Phone messages am I in legacy or "Computer"? This is just a generational change that some folks can't stand so they want to penalize #TheKidsToday
Wait, what? This is still a thing? I thought the matter was settled by the leagues, sponsors, and committees by now, and that they had collectively decided to do nothing. The rules George cites are a