Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Another\s+Use\s+of\s+the\s+Calling\s+Frequencies\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Another\s+Use\s+of\s+the\s+Calling\s+Frequencies\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [VHFcontesting] Another Use of the Calling Frequencies (score: 1): Author: Dave Agsten <w4txs@yahoo.com>; Date: Sat, 8 Apr 2006 16:49:57 -0700 (PDT); Since not so long ago everyone was up in arms over Rover rules, and now, they are upset over the use of the calling frequencies, why not just have Rovers use them? Just kidding, but isn't this all ge; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00099.html (7,079 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Another Use of the Calling Frequencies (score: 1): Author: "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <ka5cvh@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 9 Apr 2006 14:51:05 -0500; You will get no arguement from me for using the calling frequencies as well. A few of us have been pushing the use of 145.58 / 146.58 & 147.58 on two meters as FM contesting frequencies for SE Texas.; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2006-04/msg00106.html (7,457 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]