Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Best\s+VHF\/UHF\s+wattmeter\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Best\s+VHF\/UHF\s+wattmeter\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Best VHF/UHF wattmeter (score: 1): Author: "John Geiger" <af5cc@fidmail.com>; Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2014 22:47:31 -0500; Other than Bird, what have people found to be the most accurate VHF/UHF wattmeter and SWR meters? 73 John AF5CC _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontestin; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-01/msg00026.html (6,602 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Best VHF/UHF wattmeter (score: 1): Author: "Roger Thawley" <Roger@G0BSU.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 05:20:13 -0500; John, Bird only claims 5% accuracy at full scale for its Model 43 RF power meter, the model most widely used among the amateur fraternity. I would say that Bird meters are widely used in the commerci; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-01/msg00027.html (9,176 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Best VHF/UHF wattmeter (score: 1): Author: "Steve Tripp $K1IIG$" <stephen.tripp@snet.net>; Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2014 10:30:29 -0500; John, I had 2 complete setups of the Wavenode product with all the sensors they make. I was really impressed with the software display and the ability to control 2 rotors. I was not happy with the ac; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-01/msg00028.html (11,661 bytes)
4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Best VHF/UHF wattmeter (score: 1): Author: "Roger Thawley" <Roger@G0BSU.net>; Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 06:46:07 -0500; We could of course throw Coaxial Dynamics products into the mix; when it comes to accuracy, I rather imagine that they are pretty much on a par with Bird products - the elements are interchangeable w; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2014-01/msg00035.html (13,869 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]