Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+CQ\s+WW\s+VHF\s+Rule\s+question\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] CQ WW VHF Rule question (score: 1)
Author: Dexter McIntyre W4DEX <dmcintyre@att.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 12:46:21 -0400
I need some help understanding this part of the rules in Section IV. "All antennas used by the entrant must be physically connected by wires to the transmitters and receivers used by the entrant" W4D
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00123.html (6,866 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] CQ WW VHF Rule question (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 10:02:27 -0700 (PDT)
Hey Dex, It would be very cool if you would ask W1XX directly, then post the answer to the list so we will all know together. :) Ev ___________________________________________________________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00124.html (8,108 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] CQ WW VHF Rule question (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 12:31:58 -0500 (CDT)
If you accidentally make a QSO without an antenna, it doesn't count? Then it becomes a matter of semantics because whatever radiated your RF IS acting as an antenna of some sort. Maybe you're not all
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00125.html (8,310 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] CQ WW VHF Rule question (score: 1)
Author: "Bill Fisher" <wvfisher@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 14:17:00 -0400
Hey Guys, I'm thinking it trying to keep folks from using remote bases via the internet. My $ .02 worth 73 de w4grw Bill _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHF
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00127.html (9,099 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] CQ WW VHF Rule question (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz@prairienet.org>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 14:47:24 -0500 (CDT)
Yes, but the antenna is still connected to the transmitter by wires, even if the operator is elsewhere. 73, Zack W9SZ _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcon
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00128.html (9,728 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] CQ WW VHF Rule question (score: 1)
Author: Ken Alexander <k.alexander@rogers.com>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 23:26:51 -0400 (EDT)
But even if you remotely operate a transceiver 3000 miles away, the transceiver is STILL connected to its antenna (with a feedline). Seems like it's meant to cover a situation that will never occur.
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00140.html (10,453 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] CQ WW VHF Rule question (score: 1)
Author: "Eric Smith" <kb7dqh@donobi.net>
Date: Sat, 14 Jul 2007 21:39:31 -0700
Kind of assumes there is some sort of "wireless" feedline? Whaddyamean I can't feed my 2 meter horn with waveguide?-) http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/vhfcontesting ______________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00143.html (8,542 bytes)

8. Re: [VHFcontesting] CQ WW VHF Rule question (score: 1)
Author: <k2kw-8@adelphia.net>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 15:24:01 -0700
This rule has been in the CQWW HF rules for some time. The intent was to stop people from using remote receivers or remote stations in ADDITION to their main station. 73, Kenny K2KW _________________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00148.html (7,910 bytes)

9. Re: [VHFcontesting] CQ WW VHF Rule question (score: 1)
Author: "John (JK) Kalenowsky, K9JK" <k9jk73@msn.com>
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2007 17:54:17 -0500
On Sun, 15 Jul 2007 15:24:01 -0700, Kenny K2KW wrote: This rule has been in the CQWW HF rules for some time. The intent was to stop people from using remote receivers or remote stations in ADDITION t
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2007-07/msg00149.html (8,886 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu