Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Calling\s+Frequency\s+Northeast\s+on\s+900\s+MHz\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Calling Frequency Northeast on 900 MHz (score: 1)
Author: "G. Vaccaro via VHFcontesting" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 16:35:23 -0500
In the past 903.1 was the weak signal calling frequency for weak signal work in the Eastern US. . Due to interference, it has been suggested to use 902.1 which would make it the same for all the US.
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-02/msg00043.html (7,780 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Calling Frequency Northeast on 900 MHz (score: 1)
Author: Dana <ve3ds@acanac.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 16:46:00 -0500
Here in FN03, 902.1 is quieter we have these damn smart power meters in Toronto & all over Ontario now903.1 is still sort of useable, but 902.1 is much better. Dana VE3DS FN03 Toronto In the past 903
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-02/msg00044.html (7,693 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Calling Frequency Northeast on 900 MHz (score: 1)
Author: "George Sintchak" <wa2vnv@optonline.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 17:29:42 -0500
You may not need a 2nd crystal for your xverter. 903.1=145.1 MHz IF, 902.1=144.1MHz IF. In the Northeast many stations use either/or both depending on the local noise levels. 73's, George, WA2VNV HF+
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-02/msg00045.html (8,715 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Calling Frequency Northeast on 900 MHz (score: 1)
Author: Jarred Jackson <Jarred.Jackson@hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 23:21:39 +0000
George, I use both frequencies in western NY. Both my DEMI and my SG-Labs transverters work using a 144/902 & 145/903 setup. One of my rover locations is next to a commonly used repeater operating wi
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-02/msg00047.html (9,992 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] Calling Frequency Northeast on 900 MHz (score: 1)
Author: Sean Waite <waisean@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 23:44:42 +0000
I kind of wish we used 902.1 in New England. With SG lab transverters and my ft290rii it'd eliminate a lot of knob turning. I was looking into switches on the jumpers, it's not a bad idea with all of
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-02/msg00048.html (10,533 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] Calling Frequency Northeast on 900 MHz (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 18:03:47 -0600
Same here in central Illinois. My transverter is crystalled so 902.1 = 144.1 and 903.1 = 145.1. 902 is quieter. 73, Zack W9SZ <https://www.avast.com/sig-email?utm_medium=email&utm_source=link&utm_cam
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-02/msg00049.html (10,624 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] Calling Frequency Northeast on 900 MHz (score: 1)
Author: "G. Vaccaro via VHFcontesting" <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 19:11:00 -0500
To all I have 2 DEM transverters for 900 MHz I built from kits. One has a 144 Mhz IF and the other has 28 MHz. I have both crystals for each transverter but I could also just use the 902 crystal and
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2018-02/msg00051.html (11,846 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu