Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Contesting\s+differences\:\s+VHF\s+and\s+HF\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Contesting differences: VHF and HF (score: 1)
Author: "Chet, N8RA" <chetsubaccount@snet.net>
Date: Fri, 14 Aug 2009 20:38:22 -0400
Sometimes in discussions on this contesting reflector I've seen statements of "like HF'ers" and I do not know what that means. Can someone explain to me what is implied by that term so that I can bet
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-08/msg00097.html (7,280 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Contesting differences: VHF and HF (score: 1)
Author: "STeve Andre'" <andres@msu.edu>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 00:18:12 -0400
So to me, thats a reason. I know there are more. --STeve Andre' wb8wsf en82 _______________________________________________ VHFcontesting mailing list VHFcontesting@contesting.com http://lists.contes
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-08/msg00105.html (8,110 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Contesting differences: VHF and HF (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2009 14:02:44 -0500
Yes, HF people get used to running stations for the entire contest at rates like 3 or 4 an hour or better. There's an adrenalin rush that goes with this which is rare to happen on VHF. I've sat and m
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-08/msg00111.html (9,702 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Contesting differences: VHF and HF (score: 1)
Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 03:19:34 -0700 (PDT)
Hi Chet, You may be better served by asking the individual who makes such a statement. It is a common prejudicial phrase used by disenfranchised VHFers to support a variety of points-of-view. Congra
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-08/msg00114.html (8,088 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] Contesting differences: VHF and HF (score: 1)
Author: "Jim Forsyth" <mail@jimforsyth.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 08:58:17 -0700
I think you mean 3 or 4 a minute. On the N6NB pack rove we average 8 per minute on runs which last about 30 minutes. Adding Rubidium references for the microwave transverters so that we are all on th
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-08/msg00117.html (11,421 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] Contesting differences: VHF and HF (score: 1)
Author: "Kenneth E. Harker" <kenharker@kenharker.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 09:04:08 -0700
Chet, Gene W3ZZ had a good summary of this in one of his World Above 50 MHz columns in QST (which I have been trying to find through the ARRL's periodical search tool and I'm turning up blanks). Some
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-08/msg00118.html (11,685 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] Contesting differences: VHF and HF (score: 1)
Author: Paul Kiesel <k7cw@yahoo.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 11:40:31 -0700 (PDT)
Perhaps this statement is as a result of a distortion (somewhere along the way) of another statement that certain influences exist that would have VHF contest rules mirror HF contest rules. K7CW Hi C
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-08/msg00122.html (9,425 bytes)

8. Re: [VHFcontesting] Contesting differences: VHF and HF (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:08:37 -0500
Whoops! Yeah, I meant 3 or 4 a minute or better on HF. During a big opening on VHF, that might be possible. But under routine or worse conditions on VHF, a few an hour is what I usually get. In the 1
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-08/msg00132.html (12,997 bytes)

9. Re: [VHFcontesting] Contesting differences: VHF and HF (score: 1)
Author: "Eugene Zimmerman" <ezimmerm@erols.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 23:54:46 -0400
Hi Ken You are correct that I have mentioned differences between HF and VHF contests in past columns but I have never devoted an entire column to the subject so even with the limited searching tools
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-08/msg00133.html (15,556 bytes)

10. Re: [VHFcontesting] Contesting differences: VHF and HF (score: 1)
Author: "Nate Duehr" <nate@natetech.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:54:29 -0600
A sure sign that good 10 MHz reference oscillators of all sorts (GPS disciplined, WWV disciplined, etc...) are getting cheap(er) and plentiful? :-) -- Nate Duehr, WY0X nate@natetech.com _____________
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-08/msg00136.html (9,453 bytes)

11. Re: [VHFcontesting] Contesting differences: VHF and HF (score: 1)
Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:47:52 -0500
I think so! I got a few Isotemp 118 OCXO's a few years ago. They have respectable phase-noise figures and are stable and accurate enough themselves without being GPS disciplined in the field. I tweak
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2009-08/msg00138.html (10,060 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu