- 1. [VHFcontesting] Discussion #2 (score: 1)
- Author: "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <mike@ka5cvh.com>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 16:03:57 -0500
- OK we kicked around my dumb discussion about antennas a couple of weeks ago. For right now its like po-boy race night at the drag strip and its going to be "run what ya brung" this year. Onto Discuss
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-06/msg00147.html (8,294 bytes)
- 2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Discussion #2 (score: 1)
- Author: Thomas <roo@ham9.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 16:18:44 -0500
- Hi Mike and the group, If you're not afraid to get your hands a little dirty with INI files and whatnot, I've found roverlog <https://code.google.com/p/roverlog/> to be quite effective. It's written
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-06/msg00148.html (7,820 bytes)
- 3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Discussion #2 (score: 1)
- Author: Steve Meuse <smeuse@mara.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 17:43:20 -0400
- FYI, Roverlog doesn't require manual editing of config files, there is a GUI tool to accomplish that. It's an excellent program, I highly recommend it! -Steve N1JFU __________________________________
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-06/msg00149.html (8,251 bytes)
- 4. Re: [VHFcontesting] Discussion #2 (score: 1)
- Author: Thomas <roo@ham9.net>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 23:02:02 -0500
- Hi Steve, I was referring more to the rather detail-oriented networking setup. If you're running multiple positions, you have to take some time to make sure you have all the fiddly IP addresses and p
- /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2013-06/msg00151.html (7,999 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu