Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Exactly\!\s+\[was\:\s+Explanation\]\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+Exactly\!\s+\[was\:\s+Explanation\]\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] Exactly! [was: Explanation] (score: 1): Author: Ev Tupis <w2ev@yahoo.com>; Date: Fri, 8 Jan 2010 15:37:49 -0800 (PST); <snip> What if Hams were allowed to use 3 ghz to set up free wireless networks for non hams? The we would be providing something to the community. -- Here's *my* "what if". What if hill-top (VHF C; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-01/msg00058.html (8,854 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] Exactly! [was: Explanation] (score: 1): Author: Zack Widup <w9sz.zack@gmail.com>; Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2010 12:16:14 -0600; As I mentioned before, I don't think FCC or anyone else really cares whether we are using the spectrum in a manner that looks productive from people outside of our subculture. They are only concerned; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-01/msg00065.html (10,615 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] Exactly! [was: Explanation] (score: 1): Author: "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <ka5cvh@gmail.com>; Date: Sun, 10 Jan 2010 16:02:06 -0600; Harris County ARES is as you point out primarily a 146/440 user. However we do talk to the SOC (State Op Ctr) on either 40, 60 or 75 meters. And we do use the data provisions of D-star on 1.2 GHz som; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2010-01/msg00075.html (9,380 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]