Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+FN55\s+\-\s+Transverter\s+drive\s+control\?\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] FN55 - Transverter drive control? (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 14:04:37 -0500
I have been offered a solution to my amplifier woes. The mast problem has been addressed in a temporary fashion to prevent further damage while waiting for the weather to improve. Meanwhile I want to
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-02/msg00001.html (8,102 bytes)

2. Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 - Transverter drive control? (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 15:00:40 -0500
Using the -10 dBm transverter output is not an option (even if I could amplify it 20 dB). Can you please tell the list why not? In my radio (FT-2000) the transverter output is only available (and PA
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-02/msg00002.html (9,249 bytes)

3. Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 - Transverter drive control? (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 15:16:14 -0500
I have several replies already and I understand there are issues with using the ALC input as proposed. I am scratching that idea. One responder gave me what looks like the solution. I didn't want to
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-02/msg00003.html (7,927 bytes)

4. Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 - Transverter drive control? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <mike@ka5cvh.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 15:57:02 -0600
I've never done this myself but I've heard of people using a run of high LOSS feedline between the two to act as an attenuater. -- Mike Urich KA5CVH http://ka5cvh.com PIO Harris County ARES STX: (A)P
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-02/msg00004.html (8,931 bytes)

5. Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 - Transverter drive control? (score: 1)
Author: Paul Kiesel via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 22:09:03 +0000 (UTC)
This is a good suggestion. I've used RG-174 to build attenuators for a long time (I found a reel of it at a local surplus store). RG-174 is small and easy to work with. It will handle a hundred watts
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-02/msg00005.html (10,236 bytes)

6. Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 - Transverter drive control? (score: 1)
Author: Jonesy W3DHJ via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 15:10:15 -0700 (MST)
The attenuation needed would make for a very quiet receiver operation. Jonesy -- Marvin L Jones | W3DHJ | W3DHJ | https://W3DHJ.net/ Pueblo, Colorado | @ | Jonesy | __ 38.238N 104.547W | jonz.net | D
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-02/msg00006.html (9,428 bytes)

7. Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 - Transverter drive control? (score: 1)
Author: "Mike (KA5CVH) Urich" <mike@ka5cvh.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 16:33:56 -0600
MAU adds I've heard of LMR100 being used as well. -- Mike Urich KA5CVH http://ka5cvh.com PIO Harris County ARES STX: (A)PIC Dist 1 & 14 100 watts and a wire. "If serving is below you Leadership is be
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-02/msg00007.html (8,771 bytes)

8. Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 - Transverter drive control? (score: 1)
Author: Mark Spencer <mark@alignedsolutions.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 14:43:39 -0800
Hi All. I've started down this road (my radios with dedicated transverter connections don't put out out enough power from the transverter ports to run the transverters I want to use, plus I have a ra
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-02/msg00008.html (10,983 bytes)

9. Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 - Transverter drive control? (score: 1)
Author: N1BUG <paul@n1bug.com>
Date: Sat, 4 Feb 2017 17:51:45 -0500
High power attenuators are expensive and I don't like to be generating 100W on the IF frequency. I've never done this myself but I've heard of people using a run of high LOSS feedline between the two
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-02/msg00009.html (9,387 bytes)

10. Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 - Transverter drive control? (score: 1)
Author: Steve Kavanagh via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 15:43:37 +0000 (UTC)
Paul Just one more approach....if you can source ordinary resistors at a good price you can build your own power attenuators for 28 MHz quite easily. It looks like 100 1 watt resistors would be aroun
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-02/msg00010.html (9,046 bytes)

11. Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 - Transverter drive control? (score: 1)
Author: Keith Morehouse <w9rm@calmesapartners.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 09:03:20 -0700
If you can use the radios power control to reduce output to the 20-25W range, I've found this to be a simple, cheap and effective solution. I use one of these on a IC-706. I dial down the power and u
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-02/msg00011.html (10,963 bytes)

12. Re: [VHFcontesting] FN55 - Transverter drive control? (score: 1)
Author: Duane - N9DG via VHFcontesting <vhfcontesting@contesting.com>
Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2017 16:28:06 +0000 (UTC)
Paul's current plan is derived from the approach that I have used in the past that worked very well for 10M IF use. I started with a Vectronics DL300M dummy load, HRO currently lists them at $50. The
/archives//html/VHFcontesting/2017-02/msg00012.html (11,899 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu