Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+FT4\s+Question\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[VHFcontesting\]\s+FT4\s+Question\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [VHFcontesting] FT4 Question (score: 1): Author: Crownhaven <crownhaven@bellsouth.net>; Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 11:58:04 -0500; I thought I would ask here as the WSJT reflector is overflowing. How does one know if they other station is using FT4 vs. FT8? Is this something we, in the VHF and up world, want to start using vs.; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-05/msg00002.html (7,295 bytes)
2. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT4 Question (score: 1): Author: Scott Armstrong <aa5am@vntx.net>; Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 12:18:12 -0500; Hi Steve, Several ways to tell the difference between FT4 and FT8. The 6m FT4 watering hole is 50.318MHz for now (This could change) vs. 50.313 for FT8 The FT4 signal is 90 Hz wide compared with 50Hz; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-05/msg00004.html (8,677 bytes)
3. Re: [VHFcontesting] FT4 Question (score: 1): Author: Sean Waite <waisean@gmail.com>; Date: Thu, 2 May 2019 13:30:08 -0400; Another way will be that the FT8 signals will be on a 15 second cycle. FT4 lacks such a fixed cycle and won't be starting at specific intervals. I believe there's a kill switch in the software that m; /archives//html/VHFcontesting/2019-05/msg00005.html (9,774 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]